Home Itens selecionados Provedores de dados OAI Créditos Sobre Ajuda

			Busca avançada
	Provedor de dados AgEcon (8) Ecology and Society (2) Autor Almas, Lal K. (1) Amosson, Stephen H. (1) Balzerova, Hana (1) Beierle, Thomas C. (1) Dentoni, Domenico (1) Felton, Adam; Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; adam.felton@slu.se (1) Frison, Emile (1) Giordano, R. (1) Grossi, Mauro Eduardo Del (1) Guerrero, Bridget L. (1) Hudeckova, Helena (1) Kaner, Sam (1) Kaval, Pamela (1) Laurenti, Antonio Carlos (1) Maraglino, T. (1) Pappagallo, G. (1) Peterson, H. Christopher (1) Pratt Miles, Jennifer D.; Meridian Institute; jprattmiles@merid.org (1) Ricco, V. (1) Rosvall, Ola; Rosvall Forest Consulting AB; Ola.rosvall@gmail.com (1) Mais... Palavra-chave Stakeholder (10) Agribusiness (3) Agricultural and Food Policy (3) Community/Rural/Urban Development (3) Collaboration (2) Labor and Human Capital (2) Participation (2) Risk and Uncertainty (2) Adaptive management (1) Alliances (1) Alternative dispute resolution (1) Atividade não-agrícola (1) Collaborative process (1) Colorado (1) Consensus building (1) Conservation (1) Consumer/Household Economics (1) Contingent valuation (1) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (1) Countryside (1) Mais... Tipo do documento Conference Paper or Presentation (3) Journal Article (2) Article (1) Peer-Reviewed Insight (1) Peer-Reviewed Synthesis (1) Report (1) Working or Discussion Paper (1) Mais... Ano 2013 (2) 2011 (1) 2010 (2) 2008 (4) 2000 (1) País United States (8) Canada (2) Idioma Inglês (9) Português (1)		Ordenar por:  Relevância Autor Título Ano Registros recuperados: 10 Primeira ... 1 ... Última Designing Collaborative Processes for Adaptive Management: Four Structures for Multistakeholder Collaboration Ecology and Society Pratt Miles, Jennifer D.; Meridian Institute; jprattmiles@merid.org. Parties should consider a collaborative approach to scientific inquiry and learning when there are multiple jurisdictions, resource users, and viewpoints about the best way to manage a social-ecological system. A collaborative process provides a forum for scientists, managers, and other stakeholders to raise and explain concerns, articulate management goals, and suggest strategies to address concerns and management actions to achieve goals. Collaborative problem solving engages parties in dialogue that facilitates understanding of different perspectives and creates an opportunity to reframe problems as hypotheses to be tested through the adaptive management process. I review four potential structures for multistakeholder collaboration that have been... Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis Palavras-chave: Adaptive management; Collaboration; Collaborative process; Ecosystem management; Natural resource management; Stakeholder. Ano: 2013 A New Paradigm for Adaptive Management Ecology and Society Felton, Adam; Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; adam.felton@slu.se; Rosvall, Ola; Rosvall Forest Consulting AB; Ola.rosvall@gmail.com. Uncertainty is a pervasive feature in natural resource management. Adaptive management, an approach that focuses on identifying critical uncertainties to be reduced via diagnostic management experiments, is one favored approach for tackling this reality. While adaptive management is identified as a key method in the environmental management toolbox, there remains a lack of clarity over when its use is appropriate or feasible. Its implementation is often viewed as suitable only in a limited set of circumstances. Here we restructure some of the ideas supporting this view, and show why much of the pessimism around AM may be unwarranted. We present a new framework for deciding when AM is appropriate, feasible, and subsequently successful. We thus present a new... Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Insight Palavras-chave: Experimental management; Experimentation; Management; Natural resource; Participation; Stakeholder; Uncertainty. Ano: 2013 THE ROLE OF STAKEHOLDERS' INVOLVEMENT TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION: A CASE STUDY IN THE APULIA REGION AgEcon Maraglino, T.; Ricco, V.; Schiralli, M.; Giordano, R.; Pappagallo, G.. Drought and desertification are largely considered as the major and most complex natural hazards. This is mainly due to the complexity of the web of impacts that ripple through too many sectors causing serious economic, social and environmental consequences. Hence, a wide range of actors are interested by drought effects. Empirical investigations in scientific literature have highlighted the differences between the stakeholder' perceptions of drought and desertification phenomena and the results of scientific – technical evaluation. There is no unique definition of the problem, but each individual has her/his own perception of drought and desertification, which is influenced by previous drought experiences and the mental models used to analyse these... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Stakeholder; Desertification; Decision making process.; Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Labor and Human Capital. Ano: 2010 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/95201 The adaptability of stakeholders to new approaches in rural development in the Czech Republic AgEcon Hudeckova, Helena; Balzerova, Hana. The paper deals with the adoption of new approaches in the practice of rural development. Major attention is paid to the LEADER approach, with the objective of evaluating the implementation of the principles in the activities of actors associated with Czech LAGs. Techniques of content analysis and interviews with selected representatives, mainly with managers of LAGs, were used for sociological empirical research. The results analyse concrete clashes between the hierarchic structure and the principle of network co-operation, which is starting to develop successfully at state-wide and international levels. Next, the results point out the failures in the implementation of the LEADER approach in the Czech Republic which have been overcome (linked with the... Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Countryside; Development; Territorial governance; Stakeholder; LEADER; Community/Rural/Urban Development; GA; IN. Ano: 2010 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/96863 A NOVA RURALIDADE BRASILEIRA E OS DESAFIOS PARA O REAJUSTE DA P&D PARA A AGROPECUÁRIA AgEcon Laurenti, Antonio Carlos; Grossi, Mauro Eduardo Del. A inusitada demografia da década precedente ensejou uma nova concepção do mundo rural brasileiro, notadamente pela interrupção do declínio da população rural, resultante da expansão da população com ocupação não-agrícola e da população não economicamente ativa, conforme o Projeto Rurbano. O objetivo neste artigo é apresentar os resultados da avaliação do prosseguimento dessas tendências no período 2001–2006. Entre as principais semelhanças aponta-se a continuidade do aumento da população rural ocupada em atividade comercial não-agrícola e da diminuição do pessoal ocupado na agricultura mercantil. As distinções mais proeminentes nesta década foram o crescimento da população rural e a suspensão da redução do pessoal ocupado na agricultura mercantil, com... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Atividade não-agrícola; Novo rural; PEA; P&D; Stakeholder; “new rural”; Non-agricultural activity; PEA; P&D; Stakeholder; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Labor and Human Capital. Ano: 2008 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/109775 Participatory decision-making: The core of multi-stakeholder collaboration AgEcon Kaner, Sam; Watts, Jamie; Frison, Emile. The purpose of this brief is to provide insights and guiding principles that can inspire readers to conduct multistakeholder collaboration more effectively. The objectives are to demystify the process of collaboration, to make its assumptions more accessible, and especially to encourage readers to adapt participatory values and practices to their own settings. The brief describes several time-tested tools and procedures that can be implemented in a straightforward manner. Tipo: Report Palavras-chave: Decision-making; Facilitation; Participation; Collaboration; Stakeholder; Agricultural and Food Policy; Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies. Ano: 2008 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/52529 The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions: Lessons from the Case Study Record AgEcon Beierle, Thomas C.. The increased use of stakeholder processes in environmental decision-making has raised concerns that the inherently "political" nature of such processes may sacrifice substantive quality for political expediency. In particular, there is concern that good science will not be used adequately in stakeholder processes nor be reflected in their decision outcomes. This paper looks to the case study record to examine the quality of the outcomes of stakeholder efforts and the scientific and technical resources stakeholders use. The data for the analysis come from a "case survey," in which researchers coded information on over 100 attributes of 239 published case studies of stakeholder involvement in environmental decision-making. These cases reflect a diversity of... Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Public participation; Stakeholder; Science; Alternative dispute resolution; Consensus building; Risk and Uncertainty. Ano: 2000 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10686 Multi-Stakeholder Sustainability Alliances in Agri-Food Chains: A Framework for Multi-Disciplinary Research AgEcon Dentoni, Domenico; Peterson, H. Christopher. The IFAMR is published by (IFAMA)the International Food and Agribusiness Management Association. www.ifama.org Tipo: Article Palavras-chave: Stakeholder; Sustainability; Alliances; Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); Partnerships.; Agribusiness; International Relations/Trade; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession; Q130. Ano: 2011 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/119976 Integrating Stakeholder Input into Water Policy Development and Analysis AgEcon Guerrero, Bridget L.; Amosson, Stephen H.; Almas, Lal K.. Agricultural water use is becoming an issue in much of the South due to population growth. Results of projects evaluating the impacts of conservation strategies aimed at reallocating or extending the life of water supplies are being met with great skepticism by stakeholder groups. In order to gain acceptance of results, it is essential that stakeholder groups be involved from the beginning in the identification of potential water conservation strategies and be kept informed throughout the project. The objective of this paper is to review previous attempts at involving stakeholders and the methodology currently being employed in the Ogallala Aquifer Project. Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Conservation; Ogallala Aquifer; Stakeholder; Water policy; Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Consumer/Household Economics; Q250; Q280. Ano: 2008 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/46984 Is There a Link Between Actual and Perceived Wildfire Danger? AgEcon Kaval, Pamela. Over the last 20 years, costs for wildfire initial attack in the U.S. have increased significantly. The increased cost relates to wildfire suppression practices as well as the growing number of wildland urban interface (WUI) homes. Requiring WUI residents to pay an annual tax for their wildfire risk would lower costs to the general taxpayer. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) for wildfire prevention, in relation to both perceived and actual wildfire danger, was the focus of this study. Colorado WUI residents had a high awareness of wildfire risk and were willing to pay over $400 annually to reduce this risk. Respondents beliefs about wildfire frequency were comparable to the original natural wildfire regimes of their areas pre-European settlement. Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: GIS; Wildfire risk; Stakeholder; Contingent valuation; Colorado; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy; Risk and Uncertainty. Ano: 2008 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/37090 Registros recuperados: 10 Primeira ... 1 ... Última

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610 Política de Privacidade Área restrita		Embrapa Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n° Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901 Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco