Data/hora: 04/06/2024 06:24:46

Provedor de dados: 	31	
País: 	United States	
Título: 	A hazai húsmarhatartás környezeti értékelése és externáliáinak vizsgálata benchmarking módszerrel

The environmental evaluation of meat cattle keeping in Hungary and its externalities using benchmarking	
Autores: 	Bakosne Borocz,   Maria; Fogarassy,   Csaba.	
Data: 	2012-01-22	
Ano: 	2011	
Palavras-chave: 	Húsmarha; Extenzív; Benchmarkig; Környezet; Externália; Beef cattle; Extensive; Benchmarking; Environment; Externalities; Agribusiness; Environmental Economics and Policy; Livestock Production/Industries.	
Resumo: 	Benchmarking alkalmazásával vizsgáltuk a hazánkban alkalmazott marhatartási technológiákat annak érdekében, hogy valamilyen módon az externális hatásokat be lehessen mutatni. A vizsgálataink eredménye, hogy a hagyományos technológia mellett található a legtöbb negatív externália, míg az extenzív, és az ökológiai tartásmód externális, valamint környezeti szempontból is a legjobb megoldást jelenti. ------------------------------ In our study we reviewed the conditions of extensive agricultural farming and its benefits based on environmental criteria. Furthermore we examined its external effects, which may affect the agriculture and the meat cattle breeding. Beef fattening, when done intensively, can cause huge environmental problems which may cause negative externalities for the society as well. To solve this problem, the European Union tries to steer this sector towards the grazing animal husbandry practice through an extensification premium. We used benchmarking to assess the cattle keeping methodologies. The aim of this method was to identify its external effects. Our examination found that the traditional technology accumulates most of the negative externalities, while the extensive and the ecological methods are the best solutions from the position of the environment.	
Tipo: 	Article	
Idioma: 	Húngaro	
Identificador: 	HU ISSN 0046-5518

http://purl.umn.edu/119900	
Relação: 	GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics&gt;Volume 55, Number 2, 2011

55

2	
Formato: 	5