|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 67 | |
|
|
| Benítez Hernández, Javier Antonio. |
| El presente trabajo se llevó acabo en la localidad de Angostillo, Veracruz, México, donde las fuentes de abastecimiento de agua son de dudosa calidad y con insuficiencias que restringen el desarrollo rural. El objetivo es evaluar el agua de lluvia como fuente de abastecimiento convencional desde un enfoque sistémico estudiando aspectos sociales, técnicos, económicos, ambientales y normativos; la precipitación se concentra en los meses de julio-agosto (700-100 mm) la cual puede ser aprovechada para subsanar la escasez de los 8 meses restantes de periodo seco. El resultado fue un modelo multi-criterio que evidencia las ventajas y oportunidades de la lluvia en términos de calidad, cantidad, la legalidad, la infraestructura necesaria, la vulnerabilidad, la... |
|
Palavras-chave: Captación de agua de lluvia; Multi-criterio; Toma de decisiones; Rainwater harvesting; Multi-criteria; Decision making; Agroecosistemas Tropicales; Maestría. |
| Ano: 2013 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10521/1988 |
| |
|
|
| Pollard, Sharon; The Association for Water and Rural Development; sharon@award.org.za; Biggs, Harry; SANParks; Harry.Biggs@sanparks.org; Du Toit, Derick R; The Association for Water and Rural Development; derick@award.org.za. |
| We aimed to contribute to the field of natural resource management (NRM) by introducing an alternative systemic context-based framework for planning, research, and decision making, which we expressed practically in the development of a decision-making “tool” or method. This holistic framework was developed in the process of studying a specific catchment area, i.e., the Sand River Catchment, but we have proposed that it can be generalized to studying the complexities of other catchment areas. Using the lens of systemic resilience to think about dynamic and complex environments differently, we have reflected on the development of a systemic framework for understanding water and livelihood security under transformation in postapartheid... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Complexity; Decision making; Dynamic; Governance; IWRM; Livelihood security; Resilience; SES; Social-ecological systems; Transdisciplinarity; Transformation. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Turner, Nancy J; University of Victoria; nturner@uvic.ca; Gregory, Robin; Decision Research & Value Scope Research, Inc.; rgregory@interchange.ubc.ca; Brooks, Cheryl; Indigenuity Consulting Group; cheryl@indigenuity.ca; Failing, Lee; Compass Resource Management; lfailing@compassrm.com; Satterfield, Terre; University of British Columbia; satterfd@interchange.ubc.ca. |
| This paper explores the need for a broader and more inclusive approach to decisions about land and resources, one that recognizes the legitimacy of cultural values and traditional knowledge in environmental decision making and policy. Invisible losses are those not widely recognized or accounted for in decisions about resource planning and decision making in resource- and land-use negotiations precisely because they involve considerations that tend to be ignored by managers and scientists or because they are often indirect or cumulative, resulting from a complex, often cumulative series of events, decisions, choices, or policies. First Nations communities in western North America have experienced many such losses that, together, have resulted in a decline... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Insight |
Palavras-chave: First Nations; Decision making; Resource use; Negotiations; Cultural values. |
| Ano: 2008 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Almekinders, Conny J. M.; Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University; conny.almekinders@wur.nl; Stomph, Tjeerd-Jan; Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University; tjeerdjan.stomph@wur.nl; Struik, Paul C.; Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University; paul.struik@wur.nl. |
| We evaluated farmers’ rationales to understand their decision making in relation to the use of fertile anthropogenic soils, i.e., Amazonian dark earths (ADE), and for dealing with changes in shifting cultivation in Central Amazonia. We analyzed qualitative information from 196 interviews with farmers in 21 riverine villages along the Madeira River. In order to decide about crop management options to attain their livelihood objectives, farmers rely on an integrated and dynamic understanding of their biophysical and social environment. Farmers associate fallow development with higher crop yields and lower weed pressure, but ADE is always associated with high yields and high weeding requirements. Amazonian dark earths are also seen as an opportunity... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Amazonia; Amazonian dark earths; Decision making; Intensification; Slash and burn; Swidden cultivation; Terra preta. |
| Ano: 2016 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Kemp, Kerry B; Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho; kkemp@uidaho.edu; Blades, Jarod J; College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-River Falls; jarod.blades@uwrf.edu; Klos, P. Zion; Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho; zion@uidaho.edu; Hall, Troy E.; Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University; Troy.Hall@oregonstate.edu; Force, Jo Ellen; Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho; joellen@uidaho.edu; Morgan, Penelope; Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho; pmorgan@uidaho.edu; Tinkham, Wade T.; Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University; wade.tinkham@colostate.edu. |
| Recent mandates in the United States require federal agencies to incorporate climate change science into land management planning efforts. These mandates target possible adaptation and mitigation strategies. However, the degree to which climate change is actively being considered in agency planning and management decisions is largely unknown. We explored the usefulness of climate change science for federal resource managers, focusing on the efficacy of potential adaptation strategies and barriers limiting the use of climate change science in adaptation efforts. Our study was conducted in the northern Rocky Mountains region of the western United States, where we interacted with 77 U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management personnel through... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptation; Bureau of Land Management; Climate change; Decision making; Forest Service; Land management; Public lands. |
| Ano: 2015 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Bates, Lorraine E.; CSIRO Social and Economic Sciences Program; lbates@iinet.net.au; Green, Melissa; CSIRO Social and Economic Sciences Program; melissa.green@csiro.au; Leonard, Rosemary; CSIRO Social and Economic Sciences Program; rosemary.leonard@csiro.au; Walker, Iain; CSIRO Social and Economic Sciences Program; Iain.A.Walker@csiro.au. |
| To date, there are few regulations and policies relating to climate change in Australia. Uncertainty about the timing, structure, and potential impact of proposed legislation such as a national carbon abatement scheme, is leading to planning delays across the country. To assist with these policy uncertainties, organizations can embed themselves in multilevel governance frameworks that inform, structure, and facilitate strategic development, planning, and action. As part of these networks, organizational representatives also engage in formal and informal forums, a type of interorganizational relationship, which can include industry task forces, policy development committees, interagency groups, and specific climate change committees. Forums constitute an... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Climate adaptation; Climate change; Decision making; Forums; Multilevel governance; Networks; Organization. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
|
| Sayer, Jeffrey A; WWF (World Wildlife Fund); jsayer@wwfint.org; Campbell, Bruce; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR); b.campbell@cgiar.org. |
| To meet the challenges of poverty and environmental sustainability, a different kind of research will be needed. This research will need to embrace the complexity of these systems by redirecting the objectives of research toward enhancing adaptive capacity, by incorporating more participatory approaches, by embracing key principles such as multi-scale analysis and intervention, and by the use of a variety of tools (e.g., systems analysis, information management tools, and impact assessment tools). Integration will be the key concept in the new approach; integration across scales, components, stakeholders, and disciplines. Integrated approaches, as described in this Special Feature, will require changes in the culture and organization of research. |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive capacity; Decision making; Impact assessment; Integration; Scale; Social learning; Systems modeling.. |
| Ano: 2002 |
|
| |
|
|
| Cvitanovic, Christopher; Climate Adaptation Flagship, CSIRO; Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University; christopher.cvitanovic@csiro.au; Marshall, Nadine A.; Climate Adaptation Flagship, CSIRO, based at James Cook University; nadine.marshall@csiro.au; Wilson, Shaun K.; Marine Science Program, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Australia; Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia; Shaun.Wilson@DPaW.wa.gov.au; Dobbs, Kirstin; Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Australia; kirstin.dobbs@gbrmpa.gov.au; Hobday, Alistair J.; Climate Adaptation Flagship, CSIRO, Tasmania; alistair.hobday@csiro.au. |
| The rapid development of adaptation as a mainstream strategy for managing the risks of climate change has led to the emergence of a broad range of adaptation policies and management strategies globally. However, the success of such policies or management interventions depends on the effective integration of new scientific research into the decision-making process. Ineffective communication between scientists and environmental decision makers represents one of the key barriers limiting the integration of science into the decision-making process in many areas of natural resource management. This can be overcome by understanding the perceptions of end users, so as to identify knowledge gaps and develop improved and targeted strategies for communication and... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive management; Decision making; Knowledge exchange; Knowledge transfer; Science impact; Science integration; Trust. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Slinger, Jill H.; Delft University of Technology; j.h.slinger@tudelft.nl; Hilders, Marianne; DHV B.V. (Adviesgroep Water, Natuur en Ruimte); Marianne.Hilders@DHV.nl; Juizo, Dinis; Eduardo Mondlane University; juizo@hotmail.com. |
| The Incomati River Basin is shared by Mozambique, South Africa, and Swaziland. In August 2002, the groundbreaking “Tripartite Interim Agreement on Water Sharing of the Maputo and Incomati Rivers” (the IncoMaputo agreement) was signed. Following reports that the use, availability, and adequacy of information posed problems for future decision making on this transboundary river, the Delft University of Technology initiated a 6-month study in 2003 in which 25 southern African researchers and officials were interviewed. The Joint Incomati Basin Study (Phase I from 1992–1995, and Phase II from 2000–2001) formed a central component in the investigation, because it was viewed by the parties involved as a successful... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Causal analysis; Decision making; Governance; Information use; Institutions; International water policy; Mozambique; Networks; River-basin management; South Africa; Southern Africa; Swaziland. |
| Ano: 2010 |
|
| |
|
|
| Johnson, Barry L; USGS, Upper Midwest Enviromental Sciences Center; barry_johnson@usgs.gov. |
| In making resource management decisions, agencies use a variety of approaches that involve different levels of political concern, historical precedence, data analyses, and evaluation. Traditional decision-making approaches have often failed to achieve objectives for complex problems in large systems, such as the Everglades or the Colorado River. I contend that adaptive management is the best approach available to agencies for addressing this type of complex problem, although its success has been limited thus far. Traditional decision-making approaches have been fairly successful at addressing relatively straightforward problems in small, replicated systems, such as management of trout in small streams or pulp production in forests. However, this success... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive management; Decision making; Ecological resilience; Ecosystem management; Flexibility; Replicated systems; Resource management agencies; Stakeholders.. |
| Ano: 1999 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Archie, Kelli M; Center for Science and Technology Policy Research (CSTPR); Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES); and Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder ; kelli.archie@colorado.edu; Dilling, Lisa; Center for Science and Technology Policy Research (CSTPR); Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES); and Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder ; lisa.dilling@colorado.edu; Milford, Jana B; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder; jana.milford@colorado.edu; Pampel, Fred C; Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder; fred.pampel@colorado.edu. |
| Climate change and its associated consequences pose an increasing risk to public lands in the western United States. High-level mandates currently require federal agencies to begin planning for adaptation, but the extent to which these mandates have resulted in policies being implemented that affect on the ground practices is unclear. To examine the status of adaptation efforts, we conducted an original survey and semistructured interviews with land managers from the four major federal land management agencies in the U.S. states of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. The survey was designed to examine current planning for adaptation on public lands and how it differs from prior planning, the major challenges facing land managers in this region, the major... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptation; Climate change; Decision making; Federal agencies; Public lands. |
| Ano: 2012 |
|
| |
|
|
| Schiller, Andrew; Clark University; aschille@black.clarku.edu; Hunsaker, Carolyn T; Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service; carolyn.hunsaker/psw_fresno@fs.fed.us; Kane, Michael A; University of Tennessee, Knoxville; mkane1@utk.edu; Wolfe, Amy K; Oak Ridge National Laboratory; ami@ornl.gov; Dale, Virginia H; Oak Ridge National Laboratory; vhd@ornl.gov; Suter, Glenn W; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NCEA; suter.glenn@epamail.epa.gov; Russell, Clifford S; Vanderbilt University; cliff.russell@vanderbilt.edu; Pion, Georgine; Vanderbilt University;; Jensen, Molly H; ;; Konar, Victoria C; ;. |
| Ecological assessments and monitoring programs often rely on indicators to evaluate environmental conditions. Such indicators are frequently developed by scientists, expressed in technical language, and target aspects of the environment that scientists consider useful. Yet setting environmental policy priorities and making environmental decisions requires both effective communication of environmental information to decision makers and consideration of what members of the public value about ecosystems. However, the complexity of ecological issues, and the ways in which they are often communicated, make it difficult for these parties to fully engage such a dialogue. This paper describes our efforts to develop a process for translating the indicators of... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Common language; Communication; Decision making; Ecological indicators; Ecological monitoring; Environmental assessments; Environmental values; Public input. |
| Ano: 2001 |
|
| |
|
|
| ARBOUR, N.; LOPES, M. A.; PALAZZO, A.; SHUKLA-JONES, A.; TULLY, C.; TRUDEL, J-L.. |
| Abstract: Policymakers and stakeholders across academia, industry, and governments internationally are scrambling to address systemic impacts, using every tool to inform decisions made now for the future; among them, the use of strategic foresight ? imagining what could be alongside what should be. |
| Tipo: Separatas |
Palavras-chave: Strategic foresight; Decision making; Innovation adoption. |
| Ano: 2020 |
URL: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1138632 |
| |
| Registros recuperados: 67 | |
|
|
|
