|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 16 | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Dwyer, Janet. |
| Key issues in the effective delivery of EU-funded rural development programmes include simplification, transparency and accessibility. This paper draws upon the experience of rural development programming, as presented in a number of case studies drawn from recent and ongoing research by the author and others, and discussed in the panel sessions at the Salzburg RD conference in 2003, to summarise outstanding needs in these areas. Central areas of concern include a lack of local flexibility and poor integration between top-level goals at the point of delivery, as well as a lack of trust and support for capacity building and innovation among local delivery agents, where synergies between economic, environmental and social aims can most readily be identified... |
| Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Rural development policy; Delivery; Simplicity; Transparency; Accessibility; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession. |
| Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/24474 |
| |
|
|
| Sotte, Franco; Chiodo, Emilio. |
| The paper presents an analysis of the Fischler reform, while the new rural development policy for the seven year period 2007-2013 is still to be defined and other important deadlines are going to mark the near future: WTO negotiation, new Financial Perspectives, new European structural and cohesion policy, and the enlargement process is rolling on. Furthermore, several actors on the scene are new: new Member States, new Commission, new Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Affairs, new European Parliament. The main objective of this paper is to provide an overall evaluation of the ongoing reform process, pointing out the main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, for animating the scientific and political debate on the further steps on CAP... |
| Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Fischler reform of the CAP; SWOT analysis; Evolution of CAP; Rural development policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Q18. |
| Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/24475 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Dwyer, Janet; Pereira, Sandrina; Mikk, Merit; Peepson, Argo; Thomson, Kenneth J.. |
| CAP Pillar 2 policies and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) reflect a broad range of governance styles and policy priorities, as well as significant devolution to regions and/or provinces within Member States. The processes supporting this new style of policymaking have become increasingly differentiated. The Europe 2020 document identifies significant “new challenges” facing the EU’s rural areas, notably climate change, sustainable water management and renewable energy generation. All of these “new challenges” impinge on EU rural development policies, and imply a need for significant shifts in priorities and actions. This paper draws from recent research carried out within the RuDI project, to analyse the capacity of the current Pillar 2 approach to... |
| Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Rural development policy; Governance; New challenges; Targeting; Adaptation; Community/Rural/Urban Development. |
| Ano: 2010 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/94913 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Registros recuperados: 16 | |
|
|
|
