Data/hora: 09/06/2024 07:44:45

Provedor de dados: 	Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics (AgEcon Searh)	
País: 	United States	
Título: 	Eliminating Fruit and Vegetable Planting Restrictions: How Would Markets Be Affected?	
Autores: 	Johnson,   D. Demcey; Krissoff,   Barry; Young,   C. Edwin; Hoffman,   Linwood A.; Lucier,   Gary; Breneman,   Vincent E.	
Data: 	2008-02-27	
Ano: 	2006	
Palavras-chave: 	Food security; Food insecurity; Food spending; Food pantry; Hunger; Soup kitchen; Emergency kitchen; Material well-being; Food Stamp Program; National School; Crop Production/Industries.	
Resumo: 	Eighty-nine percent of American households were food secure throughout the entire year in 2005, meaning that they had access, at all times, to enough food for an active, healthy life for all household members. The remaining households were food insecure at least some time during that year. The prevalence of food insecurity declined from 11.9 percent of households in 2004 to 11.0 percent in 2005, while the prevalence of very low food security remained unchanged at 3.9 percent. This report, based on data from the December 2005 food security survey, provides the most recent statistics on the food security of U.S. households, as well as on how much they spent for food and the extent to which food-insecure households participated in Federal and community food assistance programs. Survey responses indicate that the typical food-secure household in the U.S. spent 34 percent more on food than the typical food-insecure household of the same size and household composition. Just over one-half of all food-insecure households participated in one or more of the three largest Federal food assistance programs during the month prior to the survey. About 22 percent of food-insecure households—3.5 percent of all U.S. households—obtained emergency food from a food pantry at some time during the year.	
Tipo: 	Report	
Idioma: 	Inglês	
Identificador: 	25908

http://purl.umn.edu/7249	
Relação: 	United States Department of Agriculture&gt;Economic Research Service&gt;Economic Research Report

Economic Research Report

30	
Formato: 	54