Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Registro completo
Provedor de dados:  ArchiMer
País:  France
Título:  Gravity of human impacts mediates coral reef conservation gains
Autores:  Cinner, Joshua E.
Maire, Eva
Huchery, Cindy
Macneil, M. Aaron
Graham, Nicholas A. J.
Mora, Camilo
Barnes, Michele L.
Kittinger, John N.
Hicks, Christina C.
D'Agata, Stephanie
Hoey, Andrew S.
Gurney, Georgina G.
Feary, David A.
Williams, Ivor D.
Kulbicki, Michel
Vigliola, Laurent
Wantiez, Laurent
Edgar, Graham J.
Stuart-smith, Rick D.
Sandin, Stuart A.
Green, Alison
Hardt, Marah J.
Beger, Maria
Friedlander, Alan M.
Wilson, Shaun K.
Brokovich, Eran
Brooks, Andrew J.
Cruz-motta, Juan J.
Booth, David J.
Chabanet, Pascale
Gough, Charlotte
Tupper, Mark
Ferse, Sebastian C. A.
Sumaila, U. Rashid
Pardede, Shinta
Mouillot, David
Data:  2018-07
Ano:  2018
Palavras-chave:  Marine reserves
Fisheries
Coral reefs
Social-ecological
Socioeconomic
Resumo:  Coral reefs provide ecosystem goods and services for millions of people in the tropics, but reef conditions are declining worldwide. Effective solutions to the crisis facing coral reefs depend in part on understanding the context under which different types of conservation benefits can be maximized. Our global analysis of nearly 1,800 tropical reefs reveals how the intensity of human impacts in the surrounding seascape, measured as a function of human population size and accessibility to reefs ("gravity"), diminishes the effectiveness of marine reserves at sustaining reef fish biomass and the presence of top predators, even where compliance with reserve rules is high. Critically, fish biomass in high-compliance marine reserves located where human impacts were intensive tended to be less than a quarter that of reserves where human impacts were low. Similarly, the probability of encountering top predators on reefs with high human impacts was close to zero, even in high-compliance marine reserves. However, we find that the relative difference between openly fished sites and reserves (what we refer to as conservation gains) are highest for fish biomass (excluding predators) where human impacts are moderate and for top predators where human impacts are low. Our results illustrate critical ecological trade-offs in meeting key conservation objectives: reserves placed where there are moderate-to-high human impacts can provide substantial conservation gains for fish biomass, yet they are unlikely to support key ecosystem functions like higher-order predation, which is more prevalent in reserve locations with low human impacts.
Tipo:  Text
Idioma:  Inglês
Identificador:  https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00450/56115/68021.pdf

https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00450/56115/68022.pdf

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1708001115

https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00450/56115/
Editor:  Natl Acad Sciences
Formato:  application/pdf
Fonte:  Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America (0027-8424) (Natl Acad Sciences), 2018-07 , Vol. 115 , N. 27 , P. E6116-E6125
Direitos:  info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

restricted use
Fechar
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional