Data/hora: 07/06/2024 09:28:44

Provedor de dados: | 7
País: | Canada
Título: | Interplay of multiple goods, ecosystem services, and property rights in large social-ecological marine protected areas
Autores: | Ban, Natalie C; School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University; nban@uvic.ca; Evans, Louisa S; Geography, University of Exeter; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University; louisa.evans@exeter.ac.uk; Nenadovic, Mateja; Duke University Marine Laboratory, Duke University; mateja.nenadovic@duke.edu; Schoon, Michael; Center for Behavior, Institutions, and the Environment, Arizona State University; michael.schoon@asu.edu.
Data: | 2015-10-13
Ano: | 2015
Palavras-chave: | Ecosystem services; Great Barrier Reef; Marine conservation; Marine protected area; Property rights; Social-ecological systems.
Resumo: | Protected areas are a cornerstone of biodiversity conservation, and increasingly, conservation science is integrating ecological and social considerations in park management. Indeed, both social and ecological factors need to be considered to understand processes that lead to changes in environmental conditions. Here, we use a social-ecological systems lens to examine changes in governance through time in an extensive regional protected area network, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. We studied the peer-reviewed and nonpeer-reviewed literature to develop an understanding of governance of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and its management changes through time. In particular, we examined how interacting and changing property rights, as designated by the evolving marine protected area network and other institutional changes (e.g., fisheries management), defined multiple goods and ecosystem services and altered who could benefit from them. The rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park in 2004 substantially altered the types and distribution of property rights and associated benefits from ecosystem goods and services. Initially, common-pool resources were enjoyed as common and private benefits at the expense of public goods (overexploited fisheries and reduced biodiversity and ecosystem health). The rezoning redefined the available goods and benefits and who could benefit, prioritizing public goods and benefits (i.e., biodiversity conservation), and inducing private costs (through reduced fishing). We also found that the original conceptualization of the step-wise progression of property rights from user to owner oversimplifies property rights based on its division into operational and collective-choice rule-making levels. Instead, we suggest that a diversity of available management tools implemented simultaneously can result in interactions that are seldom fully captured by the original conceptualization of the bundling of property rights. Understanding the complexities associated with overlapping property rights and multiple goods and ecosystem services, particularly within large-scale systems, can help elucidate the source and nature of some of the governance challenges that large protected areas are facing.
Tipo: | Peer-Reviewed Reports
Idioma: | Inglês
Identificador: | vol20/iss4/art2/
Editor: | Resilience Alliance
Formato: | text/html application/pdf
Fonte: | Ecology and Society; Vol. 20, No. 4 (2015)