Registro completo |
Provedor de dados: |
AgEcon
|
País: |
United States
|
Título: |
EXTERNALITIES FROM ROAMING LIVESTOCK: EXPLAINING THE DEMISE OF THE OPEN RANGE
|
Autores: |
Centner, Terence J.
Griffin, Ronald C.
|
Data: |
2003-12-17
|
Ano: |
1998
|
Palavras-chave: |
Livestock Production/Industries
|
Resumo: |
Fence-in laws in most states require ranchers to pay for fences to keep their livestock from trespassing onto others' property. Some states, or jurisdictions within states, have a fence-out rule that requires ranchers' neighbors to pay for fences to keep livestock out. Both rules are Pareto optimal. Using a potential Pareto criterion, we show that a preference for fence-out in some areas may end as conditions change, such as increased nonranching land uses. Changed conditions may have legal consequences. Specific fence-out and fence cost-sharing provisions may be potentially Pareto inefficient and may be challenged for being unconstitutional under the due process clause.
|
Tipo: |
Journal Article
|
Idioma: |
Inglês
|
Identificador: |
11401
http://purl.umn.edu/31183
|
Editor: |
AgEcon Search
|
Relação: |
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics>Volume 23, Number 01, July 1998
|
Formato: |
14
application/pdf
|
|