Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Registro completo
Provedor de dados:  ArchiMer
País:  France
Título:  Fusion of Sun-Synchronous and Geostationary Images for Coastal and Ocean Color Survey Application to OLCI (Sentinel-3) and FCI (MTG)
Autores:  Peschoud, Cecile
Minghelli, Audrey
Mathieu, Sandrine
Lei, Manchun
Pairaud, Ivane
Pinazo, Christel
Data:  2017-01
Ano:  2017
Palavras-chave:  Fusion
Image simulation
Meteosat Third Generation (MTG)
Ocean color
Ocean and Land Color Instrument
Resumo:  Open ocean and coastal area monitoring requires multispectral satellite images with a middle spatial resolution ({\sim !300 {text{m}}}) and a high temporal repeatability ({\sim !1 {text{h}}}) . As no current satellite sensors have such features, the aim of this study is to propose a fusion method to merge images delivered by a low earth orbit (LEO) sensor with images delivered by a geostationary earth orbit (GEO) sensor. This fusion method, called spatial spectral temporal fusion (SSTF), is applied to the future sensors—Ocean and Land Color Instrument (OLCI) (on Sentinel-3) and Flexible Combined Imager (FCI) (on Meteosat Third Generation) whose images were simulated. The OLCI bands, acquired at t _{0} , are divided by the oversampled corresponding FCI band acquired at t _{0} and multiplied by the FCI bands acquired at t _{1} . The fusion product is used for the next fusion at t _{1} and so on. The high temporal resolution of FCI allows its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to be enhanced by the means of temporal filtering. The fusion quality indicator ERGAS computed between SSTF fusion products and reference images is around 0.75, once the FCI images are filtered from the noise and 1.08 before filtering. We also compared the estimation of chlorophyll (Chl), suspended particulate matter (SPM), and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) maps from the fusion products with the input simulation maps. The comparison shows an average relative errors on Chl, SPM, and CDOM, respectively, of 64.6%, 6.2%, and 9.5% with the SSTF method. The SSTF method was also compared with an existing fusion method called the spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM).
Tipo:  Text
Idioma:  Inglês
Identificador:  https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00343/45413/49041.pdf

DOI:10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2558819

https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00343/45413/
Editor:  Ieee-inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc
Formato:  application/pdf
Fonte:  Ieee Journal Of Selected Topics In Applied Earth Observations And Remote Sensing (1939-1404) (Ieee-inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc), 2017-01 , Vol. 10 , N. 1 , P. 45-56
Direitos:  2016 IEEE - All rights reserved.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

restricted use
Fechar
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional