Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Registro completo
Provedor de dados:  ArchiMer
País:  France
Título:  Remote electronic monitoring and the landing obligation - some insights into fishers' and fishery inspectors' opinions
Autores:  Plet-hansen, Kristian S.
Eliasen, Soren Q.
Mortensen, Lars O.
Bergsson, Heiorikur
Olesen, Hans J.
Ulrich, Clara
Data:  2017-02
Ano:  2017
Palavras-chave:  Fisheries management
Discard ban
Compliance
Fully Documented Fisheries
Fishery inspectors
Interviews
Resumo:  The European fisheries management is currently undergoing a fundamental change in the handling of catches of commercial fisheries with the implementation of the 2013 Common Fisheries Policy. One of the main objectives of the policy is to end the practice of discarding in the EU by 2019. However, for such changes to be successful, it is vital to ensure stakeholders acceptance, and it is prudent to consider possible means to verify compliance with the new regulation. Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) with Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) has been tested in a variety of fisheries worldwide for different purposes and is currently considered as one possible tool to ensure compliance with a European ban on discards. This study focuses on Danish fishery inspectors and on fishers with REM experience, whose opinions are less well known. Their views on the landing obligation and on the use of REM were investigated using interviews and questionnaires, and contrasted to some fishers without REM experience. 80% of fishery inspectors and 58% of REM-experienced fishers expressed positive views on REM. 9 out of 10 interviewed fishers without REM experience were against REM. Participation in a REM trial has not led to antipathy towards REM. Fishery inspectors saw on-board observers, at-sea control and REM as the three best solutions to control the landing obligation but shared the general belief that the landing obligation cannot be enforced properly and will be difficult for fishers to comply with. The strengths and weaknesses of REM in this context are discussed.
Tipo:  Text
Idioma:  Inglês
Identificador:  https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00589/70096/68090.pdf

DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.11.028

https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00589/70096/
Editor:  Elsevier Sci Ltd
Relação:  info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/633680/EU//DiscardLess
Formato:  application/pdf
Fonte:  Marine Policy (0308-597X) (Elsevier Sci Ltd), 2017-02 , Vol. 76 , P. 98-106
Direitos:  info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

restricted use
Fechar
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional