| Registro completo |
| Provedor de dados: |
BJMBR
|
| País: |
Brazil
|
| Título: |
Comparison of three PET methods to assess peritoneal membrane transport
|
| Autores: |
Romani,RF.
Waniewski,J.
Kruger,L.
Lindholm,B.
Nascimento,M.M.
|
| Data: |
2019-01-01
|
| Ano: |
2019
|
| Palavras-chave: |
Peritoneal dialysis
Peritoneal membrane
Peritoneal equilibration test
Dialysis adequacy
Peritoneal solute transport
|
| Resumo: |
The peritoneal equilibration test (PET) is the most widespread method for assessing water and solute transport across the peritoneal membrane. This study compared three methods: traditional PET (t-PET), mini-PET, and modified PET (mod-PET). Non-diabetic adults (n=21) who had been on peritoneal dialysis (PD) for at least three months underwent t-PET (glucose 2.5%-4 h), mini-PET (glucose 3.86%-1 h), and mod-PET (glucose 3.86%-4 h) to determine dialysate-to-plasma concentration ratio (D/P) for creatinine and dialysate-to-baseline dialysate concentration ratio (D/D0) for glucose. Agreement between methods regarding D/P creatinine and D/D0 glucose was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis. D/P creatinine differed between t-PET and mini-PET (P<0.001) and between mod-PET and mini-PET (P<0.01) but not between t-PET and mod-PET (P=0.746). The correlation of D/P creatinine with t-PET vs mod-PET was significant (r=0.387, P=0.009) but not that of t-PET vs mini-PET (r=0.088, P=0.241). Estimated bias was −0.029 (P=0.201) between t-PET and mod-PET, and 0.206 (P<0.001) between t-PET and mini-PET. D/D0 glucose differed between t-PET and mod-PET (P=0.003) and between mod-PET and mini-PET (P=0.002) but not between t-PET and mini-PET (P=0.885). The correlations of D/D0 glucose in t-PET vs mod-PET (r=−0.017, P=0.421) or t-PET vs mini-PET (r=0.152, P=0.609) were not significant. Estimated bias was 0.122 (P=0.026) between t-PET and mod-PET, and 0.122 (P=0.026) between t-PET and mini-PET. The significant correlation of D/P creatinine between t-PET and mod-PET suggested that the latter is a good alternative to t-PET. There was no such correlation between t-PET and mini-PET.
|
| Tipo: |
Info:eu-repo/semantics/article
|
| Idioma: |
Inglês
|
| Identificador: |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2019000800607
|
| Editor: |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
|
| Relação: |
10.1590/1414-431x20198596
|
| Formato: |
text/html
|
| Fonte: |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.52 n.8 2019
|
| Direitos: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
|
