| Registro completo |
| Provedor de dados: |
Ecology and Society
|
| País: |
Canada
|
| Título: |
How is global climate policy interpreted on the ground? Insights from the analysis of local discourses about forest management and REDD+ in Indonesia
|
| Autores: |
Milne, Sarah; Crawford School of Public Policy, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University; sarah.milne@anu.edu.au
Milne, Mary; Crawford School of Public Policy, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University; milne_mary@hotmail.com
Nurfatriani, Fitri; Research and Development Centre of Social Economic Policy and Climate Change, Ministry of Environment and Forestry Indonesia; nurfatriani@yahoo.com
Tacconi, Luca; Crawford School of Public Policy, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University; luca.tacconi@anu.edu.au
|
| Data: |
2016-04-15
|
| Ano: |
2016
|
| Palavras-chave: |
Deforestation
Discourse
Environmental politics
Indonesia
REDD+
|
| Resumo: |
The implementation of “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation” (REDD+) will inevitably be affected by local social and political dynamics, with the potential for success depending significantly on cooperation from a range of stakeholders at the subnational level. Building on recent critical research on REDD+, we look at how global policy is interpreted locally by actors who are likely to be involved in REDD+ implementation. We do this by examining local stakeholder perceptions of REDD+ and forest management in two contrasting provinces of Indonesia, Riau and Papua, where deforestation rates are high and low, respectively. Using data collected from stakeholder workshops, we conduct a discourse analysis that reveals how subnational actors perceive and position themselves around REDD+ and forest governance. The results reveal six discourses common to both case-study provinces, which variously conflict and converge as they are employed by different actors. Seen together, these discourses provide critical insights into the subnational policy environment, which is largely a product of Indonesia’s underlying land and forest politics, and they indicate in turn how REDD+ in practice is likely to be interpreted and reconstituted at the local level. A key finding is that local discourses can be grouped around two divergent positions on REDD+: one that supports forest exploitation and sees limited prospects in forest carbon, and one that embraces sustainable forest management and expresses conditional support for REDD+ subject to benefit-sharing and property arrangements. REDD+ practitioners will therefore need to craft policies and project processes that account for these discursive dynamics.
|
| Tipo: |
Peer-Reviewed Reports
|
| Idioma: |
Inglês
|
| Identificador: |
vol21/iss2/art6/
|
| Editor: |
Resilience Alliance
|
| Formato: |
text/html application/pdf
|
| Fonte: |
Ecology and Society; Vol. 21, No. 2 (2016)
|
|
