Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Registro completo
Provedor de dados:  Ecology and Society
País:  Canada
Título:  How to successfully publish interdisciplinary research: learning from an Ecology and Society Special Feature
Autores:  Pohl, Christian; Transdisciplinarity Lab USYS TdLab, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich; Network for Transdisciplinary Research td-net, Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences; christian.pohl@env.ethz.ch
Wuelser, Gabriela; Network for Transdisciplinary Research td-net, Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences; gabriela.wuelser@scnat.ch
Bebi, Peter; WSL-Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF; bebi@slf.ch
Bugmann, Harald; Forest Ecology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich; harald.bugmann@env.ethz.ch
Hirschi, Christian; Environmental Policy and Economics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich; christian.hirschi@env.ethz.ch
Le, Quang Bao; Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich; CGIAR Program in Dryland Systems; q.le@cgiar.org
Rigling, Andreas; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL; andreas.rigling@wsl.ch
Seidl, Roman; Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich; roman.seidl@env.ethz.ch
Huber, Robert; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL; robert.huber@wsl.ch
Data:  2015-05-19
Ano:  2015
Palavras-chave:  Hindering and supporting factors
Interdisciplinary publishing
Mountland
Resumo:  What are the factors that hinder or support publishing interdisciplinary research? What does a successful interdisciplinary publishing process look like? We address these questions by analyzing the publishing process of the interdisciplinary research project titled “Mountland.” Project researchers published most of their main results as a Special Feature of Ecology and Society. Using the story wall method and qualitative content analysis, we identified ten factors contributing to the success or failure of publishing interdisciplinary research. They can be assigned to four groups of resources: scientific resources, i.e., previous joint research, simultaneously written manuscripts; human resources, i.e., coordination, flexibility, composition of the team; integrative resources, i.e., vision of integration, chronology of results; and feedback resources, i.e., internal reviews, subject editors, external reviewers. According to this analysis, an ideal-typical publishing process necessitates, among other things, (1) a strong, interdisciplinary coordinator, (2) a clear shared vision of integration and a common framework, (3) flexibility in terms of money and time, (4) a certain sense of timing regarding when and how to exchange results and knowledge, (5) subject editors who are familiar with the specific project and its interdisciplinary merits, and (6) reviewers who are open minded about interdisciplinary efforts.
Tipo:  Peer-Reviewed Synthesis
Idioma:  Inglês
Identificador:  vol20/iss2/art23/
Editor:  Resilience Alliance
Formato:  text/html application/pdf
Fonte:  Ecology and Society; Vol. 20, No. 2 (2015)
Fechar
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional