|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 81 | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Richardson, James W.; Anderson, David P.; Smith, Edward G.; Feldman, Paul A.; Outlaw, Joe L.; Klose, Steven L.; Knutson, Ronald D.; Schwart, Robert B., Jr.. |
| The farm level economic impacts of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (FAIR) on representative crop and livestock operations are projected in this report. For this report the FAIR Act will be referred to as the 1996 Farm Bill. The analysis was conducted over the 1996-2002 planning horizon using AFPC’s whole farm simulation model. Data to simulate farming operations in the nation’s major production regions came from two sources: - Producer panel cooperation to develop economic information to describe representative crop, livestock, and dairy farms. - Projected prices, policy variables, and input inflation rates from the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) January 1998 Baseline. The primary objective of the... |
| Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries. |
| Ano: 1998 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/42794 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Knutson, Ronald D.. |
| Over the next two decades a level of government involvement in agriculture comparable to that of the past two decades can be justified. Indigenous, cyclical, and secular characteristics of agriculture provide a strong defense of this position. Abandoning commodity programs would have adverse consequences. A realistic set of policy goals is presented and suggestions for fine-tuning government programs are offered. |
| Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Agricultural and Food Policy. |
| Ano: 1985 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/32301 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Smith, Edward G.; Richardson, James W.; Knutson, Ronald D.; Womack, Abner W.; Anderson, David P.; Outlaw, Joe L.. |
| Of the many issues associated with modifying the 1996 FAIR Act, equitability of government support across program commodities ranks high on the list of priorities. This concern is associated with both a limited amount of government support and the method that can be used to derive or ascertain some measure of equitability. Likewise, government support that is out of balance across commodities can likely become the supply inducing expected revenue -- which tends to erode market signals. This may be particularly true in times of very low (below loan rate) prices. A reference point commonly used to focus this debate is the variable cost of production per unit of commodity produced. The reason for selecting this measure is that it only reflects costs... |
| Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy. |
| Ano: 2001 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/42768 |
| |
|
| |
| Registros recuperados: 81 | |
|
|
|
