|
|
|
Registros recuperados: 12 | |
|
|
Andersen, Matthew A.; Alston, Julian M.; Pardey, Philip G.. |
Measures of productivity growth are often pro-cyclical. This study focuses on measurement errors in capital inputs, associated with unobserved variations in capital utilization rates, as an explanation for the existence of pro-cyclical patterns in measures of agricultural productivity. Recently constructed national and state-specific indexes of inputs, outputs, and productivity in U.S. agriculture for 1949-2002 are used to estimate production functions in growth rate form that include proxy variables for changes in the utilization of durable inputs. The proxy variables include an index of farmers’ terms of trade and an index of local seasonal growing conditions. We find that utilization responses by farmers are significant and bias measures of productivity... |
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Productivity Analysis. |
Ano: 2007 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/7314 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Andersen, Matthew A.; Alston, Julian M.; Pardey, Philip G.. |
This is a substantially revised version of “Capital Service Flows: Concepts and Comparisons of Alternative Measures in U.S. Agriculture.” Andersen, Matt A.; Alston, Julian M.; Pardey, Philip G., St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics; University of Minnesota, International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP), 2009. (Staff paper P09-8; InSTePP paper 09-03) |
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Agricultural Finance. |
Ano: 2010 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/92801 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Alston, Julian M.; Andersen, Matthew A.; Pardey, Philip G.. |
A common observation is that measures of productivity growth are pro-cyclical, meaning they are higher (or grow faster) on average during periods of economic expansion than during periods of economic contraction. This study focuses on measurement errors related to capital inputs as an explanation for the existence of pro-cyclical patterns in measures of agricultural productivity. Calculating a time series of capital inputs is difficult and prone to errors. Myriad assumptions are required to construct a typical measure of the capital stock, and further, sometimes related, assumptions must be made about the utilization of the stock to derive a measure of capital service flows. We test the hypothesis that unmeasured changes in the utilization of capital... |
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Financial Economics. |
Ano: 2006 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/21220 |
| |
|
|
Andersen, Matthew A.; Alston, Julian M.. |
This study compares two panel data sets that measure capital input at the state-level in U.S. agriculture. Despite a number of similarities between the data sets, such as the composition of assets, aggregation procedures, and time frame, an examination of the final estimates of capital service flows reveals that they are drastically different for all 48 contiguous states. We examine the methods used to construct the capital series for each data set, consider some important differences in data sources and the types of data used to construct the capital measures, and outline the main assumptions concerning depreciation, service lives, interest rates, aggregation, and the scope of goods included in each of the data sets. The analysis indicates that an... |
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Agricultural and Food Policy. |
Ano: 2004 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/20153 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Andersen, Matthew A.; Alston, Julian M.; Pardey, Philip G.. |
This is a substantially revised version of “Capital Use Intensity and Productivity Biases.” Andersen, Matt A.; Alston, Julian M.; Pardey, Philip G., St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics; University of Minnesota, International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP), 2007. (Staff paper P07-06; InSTePP paper 07-02) |
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: U.S. agriculture; Pro-cyclical productivity; Capital utilization; Primal productivity bias; Productivity Analysis; D24; C51; Q1; O4; O47. |
Ano: 2010 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/93143 |
| |
Registros recuperados: 12 | |
|
|
|