Home Itens selecionados Provedores de dados OAI Créditos Sobre Ajuda

			Busca avançada
	Provedor de dados AgEcon (2) Autor Benitah, Marc (2) Palavra-chave International Relations/Trade (2) United States (2) WTO (2) Agreement on Agriculture (1) Brazil (1) Canada (1) Cotton (1) Cross-border methodology (1) Dispute (1) Doha Round (1) Export credits (1) Export subsidies (1) Financial contribution (1) SCM (1) Softwood lumber (1) Stumpage (1) Mais... Tipo do documento Journal Article (2) Ano 2005 (1) 2003 (1) País United States (2) Idioma Inglês (2)		Ordenar por:  Relevância Autor Título Ano Registros recuperados: 2 Primeira ... 1 ... Última Softwood Lumber: Exact Significance of the Recent Canadian Victory before the WTO and Prospects in the Context of the Pending Second Lumber Case AgEcon Benitah, Marc. Recently, the WTO Panel in charge of the softwood lumber case brought by Canada against the United States ruled in favor of Canada. The “benefit conferred” criterion played a critical role in the ruling, which concluded that the United States used a flawed cross-border methodology to demonstrate the existence of such a benefit. However, the Canadian victory would have been more decisive if the WTO panel had found the absence of a governmental financial contribution. The cross-border methodology will be once again at the heart of the pending second lumber case before the WTO. This article evaluates the prospects for the case in this context. Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Canada; Cross-border methodology; Dispute; Financial contribution; Softwood lumber; Stumpage; United States; WTO; International Relations/Trade. Ano: 2003 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/23925 U.S. Agricultural Export Credits after the WTO Cotton Ruling: The Law of Unintended Consequences AgEcon Benitah, Marc. The recent WTO cotton ruling has led to a paradoxical result for the United States, a result that seems a textbook illustration of the "law of unintended consequences". Indeed, during the Uruguay Round negotiations of the present WTO agreements, the United States refused to put agricultural export credits in the category of agricultural export subsidies, where they would then have been subject only to reduction commitments. Paradoxically, the United States finds itself now in a position where these same agricultural export credits that it did not condescend to reduce during the Uruguay Round are openly considered as prohibited export subsidies. This article analyses and criticizes the tortuous legal path followed by the cotton panel before arriving at such... Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Agreement on Agriculture; Brazil; Cotton; Doha Round; Export credits; Export subsidies; SCM; United States; WTO; International Relations/Trade. Ano: 2005 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/23893 Registros recuperados: 2 Primeira ... 1 ... Última

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610 Política de Privacidade Área restrita		Embrapa Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n° Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901 Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco