|
|
|
|
|
| Degnbol, P.; Nielsen, J.R.; Viswanathan, K.K.; Ahmed, M.. |
| Current fisheries management approaches based on centralised government intervention have proven inadequate to deal with the present management and cannot meet its objectives including reverting stock depletion, resolving user-group conflicts, increase profitability and prevent social disruption. There is no easy solution to this problem. New institutions enabling fishing communities to deal with present pressures are needed. Fisheries management is however still largely government-driven although experiences worldwide show that various forms of partnership between government, industry and fishers strengthen management and produce results. Such partnerships have become known as co-management. |
| Tipo: Report |
Palavras-chave: Fishery management. |
| Ano: 2002 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1834/415 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Degnbol, P.. |
| Co-management institutions have generally been limited to implementation and have not extended user participation to include the knowledge basis for management decisions. This paper discusses some of the fundamental problems involved if such an extension were to be developed. One set of problems relate to the alienation of the immediate users from the formalised research knowledge which generally is used as the knowledge basis for mainstream modern fisheries management due to the different scales of observation used by formalised research and the immediate resource users and the requirement for predictability which is inherent in many modern management implementations. This set of problems may be reduced through the use of indicators of pressures and state... |
| Tipo: Working Paper |
Palavras-chave: Fishery management. |
| Ano: 2004 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1834/430 |
| |
|
|
|
