|
|
|
|
|
| Rudolph, Gwendolyn; Bochicchio, Davide; Butler, Gillian; Dippel , Sabine; Dourmad, Jean Yves; Edwards , Sandra; Früh, Barbara; Illmann, Gudrun; Meier, Matthias; Prunier, Armelle; Rousing, Tine; Salomon, Eva; Silerova, Jitka; Sorensen, J.T.; Urban, Jiri; Vertes, Francois; Winckler, Christoph; Leeb, Christine. |
| Organic production is perceived by consumers as being superior in animal welfare and sustainability and the demand for organic pork products is slowly increasing. Within the past ten years a variety of husbandry and management systems have been developed across the EU, ranging from farms with pigs outdoors all year round using local breeds to farms with housed pigs having concrete outside runs and using conventional breeds (CorePIG, Rousing et al, 2011). So far, mainly clinical parameters have been used to describe the health situation on organic pig farms, identifying some key problems, such as weaning diarrhoea and piglet mortality. Organic pig production is - amongst others - characterised through a holistic approach based on the EU Regulation (EC) No... |
| Tipo: Conference paper, poster, etc. |
Palavras-chave: Soil quality Feeding and growth Nutrient turnover Air and water emissions Health and welfare Pigs Education; Extension and communication Farm nutrient management. |
| Ano: 2012 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/22582/1/POSTER%20ProPIG%20Minding%20Animals.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Rudolph, Gwendolyn; Bochicchio, Davide; Butler, Gillian; Dippel, Sabine; Dourmad, Jean Yves; Edwards, Sandra; Früh, Barbara; Illmann, Gudrun; Meier, Matthias; Prunier, Armelle; Rousing, Tine; Silerova, Jitka; Salomon, Eva; Sorensen, J.T.; Urban, Jiri; Vertes, Francois; Winckler, Christoph; Leeb, Christine. |
| ProPIG ist ein europäisches Bioschweine-Forschungsprojekt im Rahmen des CORE Organic II Programmes. Die Studie wird von 2011-2014 in acht europäischen Ländern auf insgesamt 75 Bioschweinebetrieben (je 3 Betriebsbesuche) durchgeführt, und wird vom Department für Nachhaltige Agrarsysteme koordiniert. In den letzten Jahren haben sich Wissenschaftler intensiv mit der Thematik „Nachhaltigkeit in der Landwirtschaft“ und dem Einfluss der Landwirtschaft auf den Klimawandel beschäftigt. Die Haltung von Nutztieren ist je nach Produktionssystem (z.B. Ökologisch, Konventionell, Freilandhaltung) mit unterschiedlichen Umweltauswirkungen (z.B. Treibhausgasemissionen) verbunden. Bislang wurden die Umweltauswirkungen der verschiedenen Haltungssysteme von Bioschweinen... |
| Tipo: Conference paper, poster, etc. |
Palavras-chave: Production systems; Air and water emissions; Health and welfare; Pigs. |
| Ano: 2012 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/22616/1/abstract_Biolandbau_Tagung_BOKU_Rudolph.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Rudolph, Gwendolyn; Bochicchio, Davide; Brandhofer, Roland; Berner, Alfred; Butler, Gillian; Dippel, Sabine; Dourmad, Jean Yves; Edwards, Sandra; Früh, Barbara; Holinger, Mirjam; Holmes, Diane; Illmann, Gudrun; Knop, Denise; Meier, Matthias; Prunier, Armelle; Rousing, Tine; Salomon, E.; Silerova, Jitka; Sorensen, J.T.; Urban, Jiri; Vertes, Francois; Winckler, Christoph; Leeb, Christine. |
| Challenges and opportunities of on farm research are discussed and it is concluded, that transdisciplinary on-farm research requires from all involved parties: Understanding and willingness to learn from each other Acceptance, that own field of research is only a part of the whole “on farm picture” Sound scientific methods as well as technical tools for support (e.g. tablet PCs) Move from being/expecting “experts” towards “facilitation" |
| Tipo: Conference paper, poster, etc. |
Palavras-chave: Systems research and participatory research Education; Extension and communication Research methodology and philosophy. |
| Ano: 2014 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/25627/1/POSTER%20ProPIG%20IFSA_2014_final.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Leeb, Christine; Rudolph, Gwendolyn; Bochicchio, Davide; Butler, Gillian; Dippel, Sabine; Dourmad, Jean Yves; Edwards, Sandra; Früh, Barbara; Illmann, Gudrun; Prunier, Armelle; Rousing, Tine; Winckler, Christoph. |
| In der biologischen Schweinehaltung stellen widerstandsfähige und zugleich leistungsfähige Tiere die Grundlage für gute Tiergesundheit, hohes Tierwohl und geringe Umweltwirkung dar. ProPIG hatte zum Ziel, durch Verbesserung der Tiergesundheit und des Tierwohls auf 75 Betrieben in 8 europäischen Ländern die Umweltwirkung von Bioschweinesystemen zu minimieren. Während dreier Betriebsbesuche wurde die Situation anhand tierbezogener Indikatoren erfasst, betriebsspezifische Verbesserungsstrategien festgelegt und die Effektivität der Maßnahmen nach einem Jahr beurteilt. Zusätzlich wurde die Umweltwirkung der drei Haltungssysteme (Stallhaltung mit Betonauslauf/ teilweise Freiland/Freiland) berechnet, wobei eine große Variation innerhalb des Systems, aber kein... |
| Tipo: Conference paper, poster, etc. |
Palavras-chave: Air and water emissions; Health and welfare; Pigs. |
| Ano: 2014 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/27988/1/141105_Leeb%20et%20al_Gumpenstein_1.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Prunier, Armelle; Bodicchio, Davide; Butler, Gillian; Dippel, Sabine; Dourmad, Jean Yves; Edwards, Sandra; Rousing, Tine; Rudolph, Gwendolyn; Illmann, Gudrun; Leeb, Christine. |
| Main traits and some results of the ERANET Propig project were described during a meeting of the "Groupe National Porc Biologique" organized by ITAB and IFIP. |
| Tipo: Other |
Palavras-chave: Animal husbandry. |
| Ano: 2015 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/28257/1/ProPIG_France_Fev2015.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Rudolph, Gwendolyn; Hörtenhuber, Stefan; Bochicchio, Davide; Butler, Gillian; Brandhofer, Roland; Dippel, Sabine; Dourmad, Jean Yves; Edwards, Sandra; Früh, Barbara; Meier, Matthias; Prunier, Armelle; Winckler, Christoph; Zollitsch, Werner; Leeb, Christine. |
| This study examined the environmental impact of the three common organic pig husbandry systems, indoor (n = 24), partly outdoor (n = 30), and outdoor (n = 10), in eight European countries. Global warming (GWP), acidification (AP), and eutrophication potential (EP) was assessed per 1000 kg pig live weight on 64 farrow-to-finish pig production chains (cradle to farm gate). GWP, AP, and EP varied greatly, and the most important source was feed production, followed by housing. GWP did not differ between systems (p = 0.934), but AP in indoor systems and EP in outdoor systems were higher than in partly outdoor systems (p = 0.006 and p = 0.010, respectively). The higher AP in indoor systems can mainly be explained by NH3 arising from manure spreading, while... |
| Tipo: Journal paper |
Palavras-chave: Health and welfare; Pigs; Environmental aspects. |
| Ano: 2018 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/34749/1/rudolph-etal-2018-sustainability-10-03796-p1-20.pdf |
| |
|
|
|
