Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Ordenar por: 

RelevânciaAutorTítuloAnoImprime registros no formato resumido
Registros recuperados: 3
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
A comparative analysis of 21 literature search engines Nature Precedings
Kshitish K. Acharya; Greta Kasliwal; Haritha Haridas.
With increasing number of bibliographic software, scientists and health professionals either make a subjective choice of tool(s) that could suit their needs or face a challenge of analyzing multiple features of a plethora of search programs. There is an urgent need for a thorough comparative analysis of the available bio-literature scanning tools, from the user’s perspective. We report results of the first time semi-quantitative comparison of 21 programs, which can search published (partial or full text) documents in life science areas. The observations can assist life science researchers and medical professionals to make an informed selection among the programs, depending on their search objectives. 
Some of the important...
Tipo: Manuscript Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics.
Ano: 2008 URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2101/version/1
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
In search of the right literature search engine(s) Nature Precedings
Akhilesh K. Bajpai; Sravanthi Davuluri; Haritha Haridas; Greta Kasliwal; Deepti H; Sreelakshmi KS; Darshan S. Chandrashekar; Pranami Bora; Mohammed Farouk; Neelima Chitturi; Samudyata V; ArunNehru KP; Kshitish K. Acharya.
*Background*
Collecting scientific publications related to a specific topic is crucial for different phases of research, health care and ‘effective text mining’. Available bio-literature search engines vary in their ability to scan different sections of articles, for the user-provided search terms and/or phrases. Since a thorough scientific analysis of all major bibliographic tools has not been done, their selection has often remained subjective. We have considered most of the existing bio-literature search engines (http://www.shodhaka.com/startbioinfo/LitSearch.html) and performed an extensive analysis of 18 literature search engines, over a period of about 3 years. Eight different topics were taken and about 50...
Tipo: Manuscript Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics.
Ano: 2011 URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2101/version/3
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
How do you choose your literature search tool(s)? Nature Precedings
Kshitish K. Acharya; Greta Kasliwal; Haritha Haridas.
With increasing number of bio-literature search engines, scientists and health professionals either make a subjective choice of tool(s) or face a challenge of analyzing multiple features of a plethora of bibliographic software. There is an urgent need for a thorough comparative analysis of the available literature scanning tools, from the user’s perspective. We report results of the first time semi-quantitative comparison of 21 search programs, which can search published (partial or full text) documents in life science areas. The observations can assist life science researchers and medical professionals to make an informed selection among the programs, depending on their search objectives. 
Some of the important findings are:...
Tipo: Manuscript Palavras-chave: Bioinformatics.
Ano: 2008 URL: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2101/version/2
Registros recuperados: 3
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional