|
|
|
|
|
| Tress, G.; Tress, B.; Fry, G.; Opdam, P.; Ahern, J.; Antrop, M.; Hartig, T.; Hobbs, R.; Miller, D.; Silbernagel, J.; Winder, N.. |
| This chapter discusses challenges for PhD students involved in integrative landscape research. These challenges include terminology, epistemology, expectations, stakeholder involvement, organizational barriers, communicating and publishing, as well as career development. The chapter presents recommendations for future integrative landscape research involving PhD students and prospects for future education. The recommendations are based on our experiences in research and teaching in general, and on our exchanges with the students in the PhD master class in particular. The recommendations also reflect on the conclusions that can be drawn from the PhD students’ contributions in this book. |
| Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
| Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1136 |
| |
|
|
| Hartig, T.; Staats, H.. |
| Why do people so commonly prefer natural scenes over urban scenes? Answers to this question have implications for the development and application of research on environmental aesthetics. In a series of three experiments, we studied how the need for and the likelihood of psychological restoration affected preference for a forest versus an urban centre. In this work, we treated preference as an attitude toward a behaviour that a person could perform in either environment, namely, walking for one hour. We also manipulated the need for restoration - specifically, the degree of attentional fatigue - experienced by the person just prior to the walk. The fatigue manipulation involved either scenarios or naturalistic conditions. The walk itself was simulated; we... |
| Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
| Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1125 |
| |
|
|
|
