|
|
|
|
|
Vos, J.; Marcelis, L.F.M.; Evers, J.B.. |
The role acquired by modelling in plant sciences includes integration of knowledge, exploration of the behaviour of the plant system beyond the range of conditions covered experimentally and decision support. The purpose of the model determines its structure. Initially process-based models (PBM) were developed separately from structural (or: architectural or morphological) plant models (SPM). Combining PBMs and SPM into functional-structural plant models (FSPM) or virtual plants has become feasible. This adds a dimension to classical crop growth modelling. FSPM are particularly suited to analyse problems in which the spatial structure of the system is an essential factor contributing to the explanation of the behaviour of the system of study. Examples... |
Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
Ano: 2007 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1367 |
| |
|
|
Heuvelink, E.; Marcelis, L.F.M.; Bakker, M.J.; Van der Ploeg, A.. |
Quantifying the relevance of different plant traits for yield and quality under different growth conditions can improve the efficiency of a breeding programme. Crop models are powerful tools to give guidance to breeding, because model calculations enable the analysis of many different situations (sensitivity analysis and scenario studies). Three case studies of using crop growth models to evaluate physiological traits potentially used in breeding programmes are presented. The models used are explanatory models, with several submodels; e.g., for light interception, leaf photosynthesis, organ formation and biomass partitioning. Case study 1: It is hypothesized that yield improvement of cut chrysanthemum can be obtained by a higher specific leaf area (SLA) or... |
Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
Ano: 2007 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1308 |
| |
|
|
Marcelis, L.F.M.; Heuvelink, E.. |
The simulation of carbon allocation among plant organs is one of the weakest features of crop growth models. This paper briefly discusses five concepts of modelling carbon partitioning: 1. Descriptive allometry, proposing a predetermined ratio between the (relative) growth rates of plant organs; 2. Functional equilibrium, proposing an equilibrium between root and shoot activity; 3. Canonical modelling, a mathematical approach based on only a qualitative understanding of the allocation process; 4. Sink regulation, proposing allocation to be determined by sink strengths of the different organs; and 5. Transport resistance, calculating carbon transport from source to sink through a resistance and its utilization in the sink organs. These five concepts are... |
Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
Ano: 2007 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1375 |
| |
|
|
|