Home Itens selecionados Provedores de dados OAI Créditos Sobre Ajuda

			Busca avançada
	Provedor de dados AgEcon (8) Autor Henneberry, Shida Rastegari (8) Mutondo, Joao E. (8) Brorsen, B. Wade (3) Agustini, Haerani N. (1) Roberts, Warren (1) Taylor, Merritt J. (1) Whitacre, Brian E. (1) Mais... Palavra-chave Demand and Price Analysis (3) Marketing (3) BSE (2) Competitive advantage (2) Equilibrium displacement model (2) International trade (2) AIDS (1) Agribusiness (1) BSE impacts (1) Beef and pork promotion activities (1) Beef ban (1) Canadian meat demand (1) Consumer willingness-to-pay (1) Consumer/Household Economics (1) Country of origin (1) Equilibrium displacement (1) FMD (1) Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety (1) Food credence characteristics (1) Food labeling (1) Mais... Tipo do documento Conference Paper or Presentation (4) Journal Article (4) Ano 2009 (2) 2008 (1) 2007 (5) País United States (8) Idioma Inglês (8)		Ordenar por:  Relevância Autor Título Ano Registros recuperados: 8 Primeira ... 1 ... Última Competitiveness of U.S. Meats in Japan and South Korea: A Source Differentiated Market Study AgEcon Mutondo, Joao E.; Henneberry, Shida Rastegari. The restricted source differentiated almost ideal demand system (RSDAIDS) is used to estimate the parameters of the Japanese and South Korean source differentiated meat demand models. Expenditure and own-price elasticities indicate that Japanese beef, Canadian and Danish pork, and Brazilian and Thai poultry have a competitive advantage in Japan. The BSE outbreak in Japan decreased the shares of Japanese and U.S. beef. Regarding South Korea, the results indicate that imported beef from the U.S. and Australia, Danish pork, and South Korean and Thai poultry have a competitive advantage. The U.S. BSE outbreak decreased the market shares of U.S. beef in the South Korean beef market. Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: BSE; Competitive advantage; FMD; Japanese meat demand; RSDAIDS; South Korean Meat Demand; Demand and Price Analysis. Ano: 2007 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/9713 The Economic Impacts of Direct Produce Marketing: A Case Study of Oklahoma's Famers' Markets AgEcon Henneberry, Shida Rastegari; Taylor, Merritt J.; Whitacre, Brian E.; Agustini, Haerani N.; Mutondo, Joao E.; Roberts, Warren. The IMPLAN model is used to estimate total (direct and secondary) economic impacts of farmers' markets in Oklahoma's economy. The results show that Oklahoma farmers' markets generate a total gross sale of $3.3 million, with a total economic impact of $7.8 million. Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Marketing. Ano: 2008 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/6785 NAFTA Impacts on the U.S. Competitiveness and Trade: Beef, Pork, and Poultry AgEcon Henneberry, Shida Rastegari; Mutondo, Joao E.. The restricted source differentiated almost ideal demand system (RSDAIDS) is used to estimate source differentiated meat demand for U.S. NAFTA partners. In the Canadian meat market, the estimated price and expenditure elasticities indicate that Canadian beef has a competitive advantage compared to U.S. beef, while U.S. pork has a competitive advantage compared to Canadian pork. In the Mexican meat market, the estimated expenditure elasticities indicate that an increase in Mexican meat expenditures would lead to an increase in the demand for meats from all sources. Seasonality and Canadian and U.S. BSE outbreaks had small impacts on Canadian and Mexican meat demand. Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: AIDS; BSE impacts; Competitive advantage; Canadian meat demand; Mexican meat demand; Source differentiation; International Relations/Trade. Ano: 2007 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/9793 Welfare Impacts of BSE-Driven Trade Bans AgEcon Mutondo, Joao E.; Brorsen, B. Wade; Henneberry, Shida Rastegari. There is often a need to respond quickly to assess the likely implications of policy changes. Here, an equilibrium displacement model is adapted to study international bans on U.S. beef. An equilibrium displacement model offers a convenient way of quickly predicting the effects of supply and demand shocks. The equilibrium displacement model used here has an international sector, which allows the study of issues that past models with only a domestic sector could not. The estimated welfare loss of U.S. beef producers, due to both Japanese and South Korean bans after the discovery of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the United States, is $565.31 million. Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Equilibrium displacement; International trade; Meat; Trade ban; Welfare; Marketing. Ano: 2009 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/59236 Food Labels: Implications for U.S. Agricultural Imports AgEcon Henneberry, Shida Rastegari; Mutondo, Joao E.. Labels have been used to make food attributes transparent and to satisfy the increasing consumer demand for information about food credence values. Several types of prevalent U.S. food labels, their contributions, and the regulatory agencies behind them are examined in this paper. Additionally, studies dealing with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for labeled products and the use of food labels as nontariff trade barriers are discussed. While unilateral labeling requirements are identified as a major form of non-tariff trade barriers, positive media influence and trust in the government and science are important factors that affect consumer WTP for food credence characteristics. Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Consumer willingness-to-pay; Food credence characteristics; Food labeling; Non-tariff trade barrier; Agribusiness; Consumer/Household Economics. Ano: 2007 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/62296 Global Welfare Impacts of U.S. Meat Promotion Activities AgEcon Henneberry, Shida Rastegari; Mutondo, Joao E.; Brorsen, B. Wade. An equilibrium displacement model of the U.S. meat markets is used to measure the potential impacts of promotion investment, differentiating meats by types and by supply source, taking into account the U.S. participation in global meat markets, and considering imperfect competition in the meat industry. The increase in U.S. producer welfare resulting from a 10 percent increase in promotion ranges from -$1.29 million to $2.60 million for U.S. beef producers and from -$0.96 million to $1.67 million for U.S. pork producers, depending primarily on the advertising elasticity used. Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Equilibrium displacement model; International trade; Beef and pork promotion activities; Marketing. Ano: 2009 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/59256 A Source-Differentiated Analysis of U.S. Meat Demand AgEcon Mutondo, Joao E.; Henneberry, Shida Rastegari. The Rotterdam model is used to estimate U.S. source-differentiated meat demand. Price and expenditure elasticities indicate that U.S. grain-fed beef and U.S. pork have a competitive advantage in the U.S. beef and pork markets, respectively. Expenditure elasticities reveal that beef from Canada has the most to gain from an expansion in U.S. meat expenditures, followed by ROW pork, U.S. grain-fed beef, and U.S. poultry. BSE outbreaks in Canada and the United States are shown to have small impacts on meat demand, while seasonality is found to have a significant effect in determining U.S. meat consumption patterns. Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: BSE; Rotterdam; Seasonalitiy; Source-differentiation; U.S. meat demand; Demand and Price Analysis; Livestock Production/Industries. Ano: 2007 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/7082 Welfare Implications of Selected Supply and Demand Shocks on Producers and Marketers of U.S. Meats AgEcon Henneberry, Shida Rastegari; Mutondo, Joao E.; Brorsen, B. Wade. An equilibrium displacement model is developed and used to estimate the welfare impacts of government and industry-funded promotion programs, country of origin labeling (COOL), and the disease-driven, international bans on U.S. beef. The model goes beyond past studies by including the U.S. domestic market and both U.S. meat imports and exports, with meats differentiated by source of origin. The results indicate that while the benefits from beef and pork promotions are higher, the negative impacts of COOL are lower in a model with international trade than in a model without trade. International bans on U.S. beef decrease the welfare of producers and marketers of U.S. beef. Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Beef ban; Country of origin; Equilibrium displacement model; Pork; Poultry; Promotion; Demand and Price Analysis. Ano: 2007 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/9962 Registros recuperados: 8 Primeira ... 1 ... Última

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610 Política de Privacidade Área restrita		Embrapa Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n° Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901 Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco