|
|
|
|
|
| Strausbaugh, C.A.; Neher, Oliver T.; Rearick, E.; Eujayl, Imad A.. |
| Root rots in sugar beet storage can lead to million dollar losses because of reduced sucrose recovery. Thus, studies were conducted to establish better chemical control options and a better understanding of the fungi involved in the rot complex. A water check and three fungicides (Mertect, Propulse, and Stadium) were investigated for their ability to control fungal rot on sugar beet roots held in long term storage during both the 2012 and 2013 storage seasons. At the end of September into October, roots were collected on five subsequent weeks, treated, and placed on top of a commercial indoor storage pile until early February. Both Propulse and Stadium performed well, by reducing fungal growth and rot on roots versus the check by an average of 84 to... |
| Tipo: Article |
Palavras-chave: Root rots; Storage; Sugarbeet. |
| Ano: 2015 |
URL: http://eprints.nwisrl.ars.usda.gov/1607/1/1565.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Neher, Oliver T.; Strausbaugh, C.A.. |
| Bacterial root rot initiated by lactic acid bacteria, particularly Leuconostoc, occurs every year in Idaho sugarbeet fields. Hot fall weather seems to make the problem worse. Although Leuconostoc initiates the rot, other bacteria and yeast frequently invade the tissue as well. The acetic acid bacteria, particularly Gluconobacter, are what give the rotted tissue a fermented vinegar-like smell. The bacteria gain entry into the root through wounds caused by rodents, growth cracks, and fungal lesions such as those associated with Rhizoctonia root rot. No definite management practices for bacterial root rot in sugarbeet have been established, but minimizing problems with rodents and fungal root rots would be advisable. |
| Tipo: Article |
Palavras-chave: Root rots; Sugarbeet. |
| Ano: 2013 |
URL: http://eprints.nwisrl.ars.usda.gov/1530/1/1452.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Strausbaugh, C.A.; Neher, Oliver T.; Rearick, E.; Eujayl, Imad A.. |
| Root rots in sugar beet storage can lead to multi-million dollar losses because of reduced sucrose recovery. Thus, studies were conducted to establish better chemical control options and a better understanding of the fungi involved in the rot complex. A water check and three fungicides (Mertect, Propulse, and Stadium) were investigated for their ability to control fungal rot on sugar beet roots held in long term storage during both the 2012 and 2013 storage seasons. At the end of September into October, roots were collected on 5 subsequent weeks, treated, and placed on top of a commercial indoor storage pile until early February. Differences (P <0.0001 to 0.0150) between spray treatments were evident with both Propulse and Stadium reducing fungal growth... |
| Tipo: Article |
Palavras-chave: Root rots; Sugarbeet; Fungi. |
| Ano: 2015 |
URL: http://eprints.nwisrl.ars.usda.gov/1581/1/1537.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Neher, Oliver T.; Strausbaugh, C.A.. |
| Root rot in storage can lead to considerable sucrose losses in storage and adversely affect factory processing as well. The use of fungicide treatments applied to the root surface prior to storage were investigated to determine if they could reduce storage rots caused by Botrytis sp., Penicillium sp., and Athelia sp. Roots of the sugar beet cultivar B-5 were produced using standard cultural practices. At harvest eight roots were placed in a mesh onion bags to establish experimental units. The study included nine fungicide treatments (applied as a root dip) and a non-treated check arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Roots were then placed on top of an indoor commercial sugar beet pile and evaluated four times for root rot... |
| Tipo: Article |
Palavras-chave: Storage; Root rots; Sugarbeet. |
| Ano: 2010 |
URL: http://eprints.nwisrl.ars.usda.gov/1402/1/1372.pdf |
| |
|
|
|
