|
|
|
|
|
| Wilson, D.C.. |
| Fisheries co-management has two agendas associated with it that sometimes work together and sometimes contend. The first agenda is to make fisheries management more rational, meaning making it better able to achieve its objectives. The second agenda is to make fisheries management more equitable by giving those people who have the most at stake in management decisions a greater say in those decisions. The knowledge on which co-management is based plays a critical role in both of these agendas. If the knowledge needed for management, for example about the condition of a fish stock, is more realistic and easier to get, this helps management to be more rational. If the knowledge needed for management is contributed to, shared and controlled by more... |
| Tipo: Working Paper |
Palavras-chave: Small scale fishing; Fisheries management. |
| Ano: 2001 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1834/621 |
| |
|
|
| Wilson, D.C.. |
| The present paper is based on a collation of information, through both a literature review and an internet search, on North American programs that involve some kind of scientific collaboration between fishers and fisheries scientists. It identifies four basic models of such collaboration and offers examples of collaborative activities that seem to fit into each of them. The first model defers to the expertise of the scientist for all major decisions and creates a strong programmatic distinction between what is science, and shall be done by scientists, and what are other, related activities that can be carried out by others. Various kinds of tagging programs, fisher advisory boards, at-sea research collaboration and many other activities fit this model. The... |
| Tipo: Conference Material |
Palavras-chave: Mariculture; Fisheries. |
| Ano: 1999 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1834/620 |
| |
|
|
|
