|
|
|
|
|
| Tress, G.; Tress, B.; Fry, G.; Opdam, P.; Ahern, J.; Antrop, M.; Hartig, T.; Hobbs, R.; Miller, D.; Silbernagel, J.; Winder, N.. |
| This chapter discusses challenges for PhD students involved in integrative landscape research. These challenges include terminology, epistemology, expectations, stakeholder involvement, organizational barriers, communicating and publishing, as well as career development. The chapter presents recommendations for future integrative landscape research involving PhD students and prospects for future education. The recommendations are based on our experiences in research and teaching in general, and on our exchanges with the students in the PhD master class in particular. The recommendations also reflect on the conclusions that can be drawn from the PhD students’ contributions in this book. |
| Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
| Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1136 |
| |
|
|
| Winder, N.. |
| Mode-2 researchers are trained in Mode-1 institutions where there is now a striking mismatch between what they are encouraged to believe and what actually happens. We are expected to believe in the knowledge-based society, that development can be competitive and sustainable and that any university teacher must publish four papers every five years. This is the party line that every competitive university must endorse. They do this by ignoring dissident views - those of humanists marginalized by the commercial scholarship or of biologists bounced into early retirement by the academic paper chase. In the spirit of Glasnost this chapter places Mode 2 in a wider post-war context and sketches the distinction of research management from regulation. Management is... |
| Tipo: Conference proceedings |
|
| Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://library.wur.nl/ojs/index.php/frontis/article/view/1121 |
| |
|
|
|
