|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 1.237 | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Barthel, Stephan; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden; Department of History, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; stephan.barthel@historia.su.se; Crumley, Carole L.; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden; Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden; crumley@live.unc.edu; Svedin, Uno; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden ; uno.svedin@gmail.com. |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed article |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Biocultural refugia; Diversity; Ecosystem restoration; Resilience; Small holders; Stewardship. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Waldhardt, Rainer; Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen; rainer.waldhardt@umwelt.uni-giessen.de; Bach, Martin; Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Breuer, Lutz; Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Frede, Hans-Georg; Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Ginzler, Oliver; Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Gottschalk, Thomas; Animal Ecology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Julich, Stefan; Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Krumpholz, Matthias; Agribusiness Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Kuhlmann, Friedrich; Agribusiness Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Otte, Annette; Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Reger, Birgit; Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Reiher, Wolfgang; Resources Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Schmitz, Kim; Agricultural and Development Policy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Schmitz, P. Michael; Agricultural and Development Policy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Sheridan, Patrick; Agribusiness Management, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Simmering, Dietmar; Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Weist, Cornelia; Biometry and Population Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;; Wolters, Volkmar; Animal Ecology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen;. |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Ecosystem services; Germany; Modeling; Sustainability. |
| Ano: 2010 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Ewing, Patrick M; University of Minnesota, Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics ; ewing069@umn.edu; Runck, Bryan C; University of Minnesota, Department of Geography, Environment and Society; runck014@umn.edu. |
| The importance of corn production to the midwestern United States cannot be overestimated. However, high production requires high nitrogen fertilization, which carries costs to environmental services such as water quality. Therefore, a trade-off exists between the production of corn yield and water quality. We used the Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment for Shallow depths and Crop Environment Resource Synthesis-Maize models to investigate the nature of this trade-off while testing the Simple Analytic Framework trade-offs featured in this Special Feature. First, we estimated the current levels of yield and water quality production in northeastern Iowa and southern Minnesota at the 1-square-kilometer, county, and regional scales. We then constructed an... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Agroecology; Corn belt; DSSAT; Fertilization rate; Frontier analysis; Groundwater nitrate; GWAVA-S; Land use; Nitrogen; Rotation; Row crops; Simple Analytics Framework; Yield. |
| Ano: 2015 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Schader, Christian; Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL); christian.schader@fibl.org; Grenz, Jan; Bern University of Applied Sciences; jan.grenz@bfh.ch; Meier, Matthias S; Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL); matthias.meier@fibl.org; Stolze, Matthias; Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL); matthias.stolze@fibl.org. |
| With sustainability within food systems becoming an increasingly important issue, several approaches that claim to assess the sustainability of farms, farming systems, and supply chains have been developed. Looking more closely at these sustainability impact assessment approaches, we discerned considerable differences between them in terms of scope, the level of assessment, and the precision of indicators used for impact assessment. Our aim was to classify and analyze a range of available sustainability impact assessment approaches with respect to scope and precision. From a total of 35 sustainability assessment approaches, we selected 6 for a detailed comparison. From our analysis, we concluded that there are 3 different types of trade-offs in these... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Classification; Life cycle assessment; SAFA guidelines; Sustainability assessment; Typology. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Grau, H. Ricardo; Universidad Nacional de Tucuman; CONICET; chilograu@gmail.com; Aide, Mitchell; University of Puerto Rico; tmaide@yahoo.com. |
| Current socioeconomic drivers of land-use change associated with globalization are producing two contrasting land-use trends in Latin America. Increasing global food demand (particularly in Southeast Asia) accelerates deforestation in areas suitable for modern agriculture (e.g., soybean), severely threatening ecosystems, such as Amazonian rain forests, dry forests, and subtropical grasslands. Additionally, in the coming decades, demand for biofuels may become an emerging threat. In contrast, high yields in modern agricultural systems and rural–urban migration coupled with remittances promote the abandonment of marginal agricultural lands, thus favoring ecosystem recovery on mountains, deserts, and areas of poor soils, while improving human... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Insight |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Deforestation; Ecological transition; Forest transition; Globalization; Land-use change; Latin America. |
| Ano: 2008 |
|
| |
|
|
| Isbell, Forest; Department of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota; forest.isbell@gmail.com; Loreau, Michel; Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Experimental Ecology Station, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Moulis, France; michel.loreau@ecoex-moulis.cnrs.fr. |
| Humans influence and depend on natural systems worldwide, creating complex societal-ecological feedbacks that make it difficult to assess the long-term sustainability of contemporary human activities. We use ecological niche theory to consider the short-term (transient) and long-term (equilibrium) effects of improvements in health, agriculture, or efficiency on the abundances of humans, our plant and animal resources, and our natural enemies. We also consider special cases of our model where humans shift to a completely vegetarian diet, or completely eradicate natural enemies. We find that although combinations of health, agriculture, and efficiency improvements tend to support more people and plant resources, they also result in more natural enemies and... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Human health; Niche theory. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Blumenthal, Dana M; University of Minnesota; dblumenthal@npa.ars.usda.gov; Jannink, Jean-Luc; University of Minnesota; jjannink@iastate.edu. |
| Collaboration among multiple stakeholders can be crucial to the success of natural resource management. In recent years, a wide variety of methods have been developed to facilitate such collaboration. Because these methods are relatively new and come from different disciplines, little attention has been paid to drawing comparisons among them. Thus, it is very difficult for potential users to sort through the increasingly large literature regarding such methods. We suggest the use of a consistent framework for comparing collaborative management methods, and develop such a framework based on five criteria: participation, institutional analysis, simplification of the natural resource, spatial scale, and stages in the process of natural resource management. We... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive management; Agriculture; Agroecosystem analysis; Collaboration; Ecosystem management; Natural resource management; Participatory rural appraisal; Rapid rural appraisal; Soft systems analysis. |
| Ano: 2000 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Pauli, Natasha; School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia; natasha.pauli@uwa.edu.au; Abbott, Lynette K; School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia; lynette.abbott@uwa.edu.au. |
| General knowledge of the small, invisible, or hidden organisms that make soil one of the most biodiverse habitats on Earth is thought to be scarce, despite their importance in food systems and agricultural production. We provide the first worldwide review of high-quality research that reports on farmers’ knowledge of soil organisms in agriculture. The depth of farmers’ knowledge varied; some farming communities held detailed local taxonomies and observations of soil biota, or used soil biological activity as indicators of soil fertility, while others were largely unaware of soil fauna. Elicitation of soil biota knowledge was often incidental to the main research goal in many of the reviewed studies. Farmers are rarely deliberately or... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Ethnoecology; Ethnopedology; Farmer knowledge; Local knowledge; Soil biota. |
| Ano: 2016 |
|
| |
| Registros recuperados: 1.237 | |
|
|
|
