|
|
|
|
|
de Roest, Kees; Jongeneel, Roelof A.; Dillen, Koen; Winsten, Jonathan R.. |
Beef and pig production are important sectors affected by the cross-compliance policy. Full compliance with SMRs and GAECs generates costs and benefits which may have an impact on the competitiveness of these sectors on the world market. Compliance with the Nitrate Directive, animal identification and registration requirements and animal welfare standards can give rise to non-negligible cost of production increases at individual farm level and at sector level. Additional costs can be relevant either due to a low degree of compliance or by significant adjustments costs at farm level. Full compliance generates a level playing field between Member States of the EU, as some countries have to face higher additional costs than others, which are be attributed to... |
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Cross compliance; Beef sector; Pork sector; Agricultural and Food Policy; Q10; Q18. |
Ano: 2008 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/44824 |
| |
|
|
Maze, Armelle. |
The optimal level of formalisation of contracts and their dynamic is at stake in the economic literature on the optimum design of ex post renegotiation with third party enforcement. Another theoretical interpretation is that contract adaptations may also reflect mutual learning process between contractors. Why transactors write explicit contract that they know cannot be court enforced? The central idea is that explicit contract terms makes it clearer to the transactors what has been agreed upon, thus are decreasing the cost of private enforcement sanctions (Klein, 1996). Empirical evidences are provided by the diachronic analysis of the full set of tri-partite contracts between one of the top-ten french large retailer and its beef suppliers before and... |
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Contract design; Hold-up problems; Beef sector; Self-Enforcement; Agribusiness. |
Ano: 2002 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/24957 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|