Home Itens selecionados Provedores de dados OAI Créditos Sobre Ajuda

			Busca avançada
	Provedor de dados AgEcon (10) Autor Drabik, Dusan (4) Just, David R. (4) de Gorter, Harry (4) Jotzo, Frank (2) Mazouz, Salim (2) Pezzey, John C.V. (2) Bento, Antonio M. (1) Fischer, Carolyn (1) Fox, Alan K. (1) Karp, Larry S. (1) Klotz, Richard (1) Landry, Joel R. (1) McCorriston, Steve (1) Sheldon, Ian M. (1) Zhao, Jinhua (1) Mais... Palavra-chave Carbon leakage (10) Environmental Economics and Policy (7) Q54 (6) Resource /Energy Economics and Policy (5) Biofuels (3) Climate policy (3) Q42 (3) Afforestation (2) Agricultural and Food Policy (2) Australia (2) Domestic leakage (2) Emission trading (2) Emissions savings (2) Forestry (2) Land Economics/Use (2) Lobbying (2) Mandate (2) Market leakage (2) Q23 (2) Q24 (2) Mais... Tipo do documento Conference Paper or Presentation (7) Working or Discussion Paper (2) Report (1) Ano 2011 (5) 2010 (2) 2009 (2) 2004 (1) País United States (10) Idioma Inglês (10)		Ordenar por:  Relevância Autor Título Ano Registros recuperados: 10 Primeira ... 1 ... Última Are there Carbon Savings from US Biofuel Policies? Accounting for Leakage in Land and Fuel Markets AgEcon Bento, Antonio M.; Klotz, Richard; Landry, Joel R.. This paper applies the insights of the carbon leakage literature to study the emissions consequences of biofuel policies. We develop a simple analytic framework to decompose the intended emissions impacts of biofuel policy from four sources of carbon leakage: domestic fuel markets, domestic land markets, world land markets and world crude oil markets. A numerical simulation model illustrates the magnitude of each source of leakage for combinations of two current US biofuel policies: the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (VEETC) and the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). In the presence of both land and fuel market leakage, current US biofuel policies are unlikely to reduce greenhouse gases. Four of the five policy scenarios we consider lead to increases in... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Multi-market; Carbon leakage; Biofuels; Greenhouse gases; Agricultural and Food Policy; Land Economics/Use; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy; Q42; Q54; Q58. Ano: 2011 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/104008 Suggestions for the Road to Copenhagen AgEcon Karp, Larry S.; Zhao, Jinhua. We provide a unified discussion of the issues that confront negotiators of the next international climate agreement. We offer a novel proposal that entitles countries to discharge their treaty obligations by paying a “fine”. This escape clause provides cost insurance, simplifies the problem of enforcing compliance, and increases incentives to participate in the agreement. We explain why developed country obligations should rely on a cap and trade commitment rather than carbon taxes. A Central Bank maintains stability of carbon prices by defending a price ceiling and floor. An so-called intensity target is not a good alternative to an emissions cap. Modest trade restrictions, consistent with WTO law, will form an important part of the next agreement.... Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Kyoto protocol; Escape clause; Emissions trade; Taxes versus cap and trade; Price stability; Carbon leakage; Trade restrictions; Differentiated responsibility; Clean development mechanism; Sectoral agreements; Demand and Price Analysis; Environmental Economics and Policy; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy; Q54; Q58; F13. Ano: 2009 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/51610 Modeling Carbon Leakages with Forestation Policies AgEcon de Gorter, Harry; Drabik, Dusan; Just, David R.. This paper analyzes carbon leakage due to reduced emissions from deforestation (RED). We find that leakage with RED is good because the policy induces afforestation that contributes to a further carbon sequestration. By ignoring the domestic component of carbon leakage, the literature can either overestimate or underestimate leakage, depending on the magnitudes of the numerator and the denominator of the leakage formulas. Unlike the literature, we include the land and agricultural markets in the analysis of carbon leakage with forestation policies. In this model, carbon leakage depends on: (1) supply and demand elasticities of timber production and consumption, respectively in the country introducing a RED policy (Home country) and in the rest of the... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Carbon leakage; Forestry; Reduced emissions from deforestation; Afforestation; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy; Q23; Q24; Q54. Ano: 2011 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/114450 The logic of collective action and Australia’s Climate Policy AgEcon Pezzey, John C.V.; Mazouz, Salim; Jotzo, Frank. The Australian Government's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS), March 2009, set a target of 5 to 15 per cent emission cuts during 2000 and 2020. The proposed target is weak and is likely to increase mitigation costs in Australia in the long run. This research report analyses the target’s efficiency as well as provisions for preventing carbon leakage. The research also looks at the nature of changes to the CPRS made during 2008 as well as the likely cause of these changes. The free allocation of output-linked, tradable permits to Emissions-Intensive, Trade-Exposed (EITE) sectors was much higher than previously proposed and greater than what is needed to prevent carbon leakage. This means EITE emissions could rise by 13 per cent during 2010 and... Tipo: Report Palavras-chave: Climate policy; Australia; Targets; Emission trading; Carbon leakage; Lobbying; Environmental Economics and Policy; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy. Ano: 2009 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/94824 The Implications of Alternative Biofuel Policies on Carbon Leakage AgEcon Drabik, Dusan; de Gorter, Harry; Just, David R.. We show carbon leakage depends on the type of biofuel policy (tax credit versus mandate), the domestic and foreign gasoline supply and fuel demand elasticities, and on consumption and production shares of world oil markets for the country introducing the biofuel policy. The components of carbon leakage – market leakage and emissions savings – are counteracting: carbon leakage increases with market leakage but decreases with emissions savings. We also distinguish domestic and international leakage where the latter is always positive, but domestic leakage can be negative with a mandate. The IPCC definition of leakage omits domestic leakage, resulting in biased estimates. Leakage with a tax credit always exceeds that of a mandate, while the combination of a... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Biofuels; Tax credit; Mandate; Market leakage; Carbon leakage; Emissions savings; Domestic leakage; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy; Q27; Q41; Q42; Q54. Ano: 2011 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/114432 Climate Policy, Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness: How Might Border Tax Adjustments Help? AgEcon Sheldon, Ian M.; McCorriston, Steve. In this paper, analysis is presented relating to the impact of border tax adjustments for climate policy on the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries, and the related problem of carbon leakage. While many of the economic and legal issues are not particularly new, climate policy does present some possible twists to the analysis of border tax adjustments when vertically-related markets can be characterized as a successive oligopoly. Specifically, an appropriate border tax adjustment will depend on the incidence of a domestic carbon tax, the nature of competition in upstream and downstream sectors, as well as the basis for assessing the trade neutrality of any border tax adjustment. If trade neutrality is defined in terms of market... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Climate policy; Carbon leakage; Border tax adjustments; Imperfect competition; Environmental Economics and Policy; International Relations/Trade; H87; Q38. Ano: 2011 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/103207 Output-Based Allocations of Emissions Permits: Efficiency and Distributional Effects in a General Equilibrium Setting with Taxes and Trade AgEcon Fischer, Carolyn; Fox, Alan K.. The choice of mechanism for allocating tradable emissions permits has important efficiency and distributional effects when tax and trade distortions are considered. We present different rules for allocating carbon allowances within sectors (lump-sum grandfathering, output-based allocation [OBA], and auctioning) and among sectors (historical emissions and value-added shares). Using a partial equilibrium model, we explore how OBA mitigates price increases, limits incentives for conservation in favor of lowering energy intensity, and changes relative output prices among sectors. We then use a computable general equilibrium model from the Global Trade Analysis Project, modified to incorporate a labor/leisure choice, to compare overall mechanism performance.... Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Emissions trading; Output-based allocation; Tax interaction; Carbon leakage; Environmental Economics and Policy; Q2; Q43; H2; D61. Ano: 2004 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10654 THE LOGIC OF COLLECTIVE ACTION AND AUSTRALIA'S CLIMATE POLICY AgEcon Pezzey, John C.V.; Mazouz, Salim; Jotzo, Frank. We thank two anonymous referees and the Department of Climate Change for helpful comments. This research was supported financially by the Environmental Economics Research Hub of the Australian Government's Commonwealth Environment Research Facilities program. Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Climate policy; Australia; Targets; Emission trading; Carbon leakage; Lobbying; Environmental Economics and Policy. Ano: 2010 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/59577 Carbon Leakage with Forestation Policies AgEcon de Gorter, Harry; Drabik, Dusan; Just, David R.. This paper analyzes carbon leakage due to reduced emissions from deforestation (RED). We find that leakage with RED is good because the policy induces afforestation that contributes to a further carbon sequestration. By ignoring the domestic component of carbon leakage, the literature can either overestimate or underestimate leakage, depending on the magnitudes of the numerator and the denominator of the leakage formulas. Unlike the literature, we include the land and agricultural markets in the analysis of carbon leakage with forestation policies. In this model, carbon leakage depends on: (1) supply and demand elasticities of timber production and consumption, respectively in the country introducing a RED policy (Home country) and in the rest of the... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Carbon leakage; Forestry; Reduced emissions from deforestation; Afforestation; Agricultural and Food Policy; Environmental Economics and Policy; Land Economics/Use; Q23; Q24; Q54. Ano: 2011 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/103797 The Implications of Alternative Biofuel Policies on Carbon Leakage AgEcon Drabik, Dusan; de Gorter, Harry; Just, David R.. We show how leakage differs, depending on the biofuel policy and market conditions. Carbon leakage is shown to have two components: a market leakage effect and an emissions savings effect. We also distinguish domestic and international leakage and show how omitting the former like the IPCC does can bias leakage estimates. International leakage is always positive, but domestic leakage can be negative. The magnitude of market leakage depends on the domestic and foreign gasoline supply and fuel demand elasticities, and on consumption and production shares of world oil markets for the country introducing the biofuel policy. Being a small country in world oil markets does not automatically imply that leakage is 100 percent or above that of a large country. We... Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Biofuels; Market leakage; Carbon leakage; Emissions savings; Domestic leakage; Tax credit; Mandate; Environmental Economics and Policy; Q27; Q41; Q42; Q54. Ano: 2010 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/102689 Registros recuperados: 10 Primeira ... 1 ... Última

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610 Política de Privacidade Área restrita		Embrapa Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n° Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901 Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco