|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 43 | |
|
|
| SAWADA, Manabu; AIZAKI, Hideo; SATO, Kazuo; KIKKAWA, Toshiko; 澤田, 学; 合崎, 英男; 佐藤, 和夫; 吉川, 肇子. |
| The purpose of this paper was to verify the stability of consumers’ evaluations of food safety by conducting the identical choice experiments questionnaire survey at the same site two different times. The two surveys, measuring the consumers’ evaluations of beef derived from cattle fed in accordance with improved food safety measures were conducted in January 2003 (n = 83) and March 2004 (n = 369) in Kiyota ward of Sapporo city in Hokkaido, Japan. A comparison of the results of the two surveys suggests that social issues related to the choice experiment questions can significantly influence the consumers’ inferred values for food safety on the basis of the questions.本稿の目的は，同一の選択実験を同一地域の異なる２ 時点で行い，食品安全性に関する消費者評価の安定性を 検討することである。北海道札幌市清田区の住民を対象... |
|
Palavras-chave: Beef; Food safety; Consumers’ evaluation; Stated preference methods; Choice experiments; 牛肉; 食品安全性; 消費者評価; 表明選好法; 選択実験. |
| Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://ir.obihiro.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10322/2648 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Steiner, Bodo E.; Yang, Jun. |
| Following the May 2003 Canadian BSE case, food safety issues have become even more prominent to policymakers and consumers. In both Canada and the US, governments and industry have responded with a variety of quality assurance, traceability and labeling schemes. However, there is little information available on the extent to which consumer perceptions differ regionally across North America towards labeling schemes. This paper attempts to fill this gap, by providing results on a variety of beef labeling strategies from choice experiments that were conducted in Alberta (Canada) and Montana (US). The analysis focuses on consumers' perceptions towards negative voluntary labeling with regard to BSE testing, genetically modified organisms (GMO) and the use of... |
| Tipo: Report |
Palavras-chave: Choice experiments; Multinomial logit; Beef labeling; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; D12; L66; C35. |
| Ano: 2007 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/6836 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Chang, Jae Bong; Lusk, Jayson L.; Norwood, F. Bailey. |
| We compare the ability of three preference elicitation methods (hypothetical choices, non-hypothetical choices, and non-hypothetical rankings) and three discrete-choice econometric models (the multinomial logit, the independent availability logit, and the random parameter logit) to predict actual retail shopping behavior in three different product categories (ground beef, wheat flour, and dishwashing liquid). Overall, across all methods, we find a reasonably high level of external validity. Our results suggest that the non-hypothetical elicitation approaches, especially the non-hypothetical ranking, outperformed the hypothetical choice experiment in predicting retail sales. We also find that the random parameter logit can have superior predictive... |
| Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Contingent valuation; Choice experiments; Experimental economics; External validity; Field experiment; Agribusiness; Consumer/Household Economics; Marketing; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods. |
| Ano: 2008 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/43600 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Registros recuperados: 43 | |
|
|
|
