|
|
|
|
|
Janssen, Marco A; Arizona State University; Marco.Janssen@asu.edu. |
In Janssen et al. (2006), we presented a bibliometric analysis of the resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation knowledge domains within the research activities on human dimensions of global environmental change. We have updated the analysis because 2 years have gone by since the original analysis, and 1113 more publications can now be added to the database. We analyzed how the resulting 3399 publications between 1967 and 2007 are related in terms of co-authorship and citations. The rapid increase in the number of publications in the three knowledge domains continued over the last 2 years, and we still see an overlap between the knowledge domains. We were also able to identify the “hot” publications of the last 2 years. |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed article |
Palavras-chave: Adaptation; Bibliometric analysis; Citations; Resilience; Vulnerability. |
Ano: 2007 |
|
| |
|
|
Dickinson, E.C.. |
Blyth’s Catalogue is sometimes cited from 1849 and sometimes from 1852. Both dates can be found in Peters’s Check-list, each, in different volumes, appearing to be accepted. Consequently and inconsistently both are found in other works. The cover is dated 1849. The evidence, however, shows that while much was printed in 1849 publication was not before September 1852. Meanwhile Blyth’s ’Supplemental Note’ appeared in 1849. Most of the new taxa described in that were described then to ensure that Blyth’s names, already in his proof sheets for his Catalogue, obtained priority. In Peters’s Check-list most of these names have been cited correctly, i.e. from his Supplemental Note. However, a few exceptions need attention and their dates need to be corrected in... |
Tipo: Article / Letter to the editor |
Palavras-chave: Blyth; Hodgson; Catalogue; Corrections; Dates; Citations; Dumetia; Dinopium benghalense dilutum; Lectotype; Cisticola exilis tytleri; 42.83. |
Ano: 2004 |
URL: http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/record/215559 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Meneghini,R.. |
A recent assessment of 4400 postgraduate courses in Brazil by CAPES (a federal government agency dedicated to the improvement of the quality of and research at the postgraduate level) stimulated a large amount of manifestations in the press, scientific journals and scientific congresses. This gigantic effort to classify 16,400 scientific journals in order to provide indicators for assessment proved to be puzzling and methodologically erroneous in terms of gauging the institutions from a metric point of view. A simple algorithm is proposed here to weigh the scientometric indicators that should be considered in the assessment of a scientific institution. I conclude here that the simple gauge of the total number of citations accounts for both the productivity... |
Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
Palavras-chave: Scientometrics; Institutional assessment; CAPES; Scientific journals; Citations. |
Ano: 2011 |
URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2011000800002 |
| |
|
|
|