|
|
|
|
|
Sanders, Dwight R.; Manfredo, Mark R.. |
One-step-ahead forecasts of quarterly live cattle, live hog, and broiler prices are evaluated under two general approaches: accuracy-based measures and classification based measures which test the ability to categorize price movements directionally or within a forecasted range. Results suggest U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) price forecasts are not optimal. Broiler price forecasts are biased, and all the forecast series tend to repeat errors. While the USDA forecasts are more accurate than those of a univariate AR(4) time-series model, evidence suggests the USDA live cattle forecasts could be improved with a composite forecast that includes a time-series alternative. Despite this, the USDA correctly identifies the direction of price change in at... |
Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Forecast efficiency; Forecast evaluation; Livestock prices; USDA forecasts; Livestock Production/Industries. |
Ano: 2003 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/31101 |
| |
|
|
Sanders, Dwight R.; Manfredo, Mark R.. |
One step-ahead forecasts of quarterly live cattle, live hog, and broiler prices are evaluated under two general approaches: accuracy-based measures and the ability to categorize price movements directionally or within a forecasted range. Results suggest USDA price forecasts are not optimal. Broiler price forecasts are biased, and all the forecast series tend to repeat errors. While the USDA forecasts are more accurate that those of a univariate AR(4) time series model, the evidence suggests that live cattle forecasts could be improved with a composite forecast. However, the USDA correctly identifies the direction of price change in at least 70% of its forecasts. Prices fall within the USDA's forecasted range 48% of the time for broilers but only 35% for... |
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Forecast evaluation; Forecast efficiency; USDA forecasts; Demand and Price Analysis. |
Ano: 2003 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/18990 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|