|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 55 | |
|
|
| Anguiano Mondragón, Emmanuel. |
| Las pruebas de no-inferioridad para comparar proporciones son frecuentemente empleadas en los ensayos clínicos con el objeto de verificar si hay evidencia muestral de que un tratamiento nuevo no es significativamente inferior en eficacia al tratamiento estándar, donde el tratamiento nuevo presenta algunas ventajas sobre el tratamiento estándar como por ejemplo: tener menos efectos secundarios, ser más barato o ser más fácil de aplicar. Un buen número de pruebas de no-inferioridad se han reportado en la literatura. Desafortunadamente, las comparaciones de las pruebas de no inferioridad reportadas hasta ahora son insatisfactorias pues se han realizado utilizando simulaciones o aproximaciones gruesas. Utilizando el concepto de “potencia media”, Martín-Andrés... |
|
Palavras-chave: Pruebas de no-inferioridad; Potencia; Potencia media; Tamaños de prueba; Non-inferiority tests; Power; Mean power; Test size; Estadística; Doctorado. |
| Ano: 2013 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10521/2185 |
| |
|
|
| Delgado Piña, Deborah. |
| Esta investigación hace un análisis en torno a la identidad, a partir de una vivencia concreta: Proyecto de empoderamiento (2004). Tiene los objetivos de conocer el vínculo que se establece entre el empoderamiento de las mujeres y los cambios que se suscitan en su identidad así como conocer desde su discurso, los cambios que ellas detectan en su identidad (autoreconocimiento, autoconcepto, autoestima). Se buscó determinar que el proyecto de Empoderamiento de Mujeres, 2004, en Celaya, Gto. ha influido para promover cambios en la identidad de las siete mujeres que participaron, en el plano personal, familiar y comunitario. Las técnicas utilizadas fueron: observación, entrevista, relato de vida, test Machover, test htp y test de la familia. El... |
| Tipo: Tesis |
Palavras-chave: Identidad; Poder; Cambios; Programa; Proyecto; Maestría; Desarrollo Rural; Power; Identity; Changes; Program; Project. |
| Ano: 2008 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10521/1291 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Ingalls, Micah L; Poverty-Environment Initiative, United Nations Development Programme; Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University; mli6@cornell.edu; Stedman, Richard C; Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University; rcs6@cornell.edu. |
| Significant and growing concerns relating to global social and environmental conditions and processes have raised deep questions relating to the ability of traditional governance regimes to manage for the complexities of social-ecological systems. The resilience framework provides a more dynamic approach to system analysis and management, emphasizing nonlinearity, feedbacks, and multiscalar engagement along the social-ecological nexus. In recent years, however, a number of scholars and practitioners have noted various insufficiencies in the formulation of the resilience framework, including its lack of engagement with the dimensions of power within social-ecological systems, which blunt the analytical potential of resilience and run the risk of undermining... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Political ecology; Power; Resilience; Social-ecological systems. |
| Ano: 2016 |
|
| |
|
|
| Wynberg, Rachel; Environmental Evaluation Unit, Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town; rachel.wynberg@uct.ac.za; Hauck, Maria; Environmental Evaluation Unit, Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town; MHauck4@gmail.com. |
| The concept of benefit sharing has seen growing adoption in recent years by a variety of sectors. However, its conceptual underpinnings, definitions, and framework remain poorly articulated and developed. We aim to help address this gap by presenting a new conceptual approach for enhancing understanding about benefit sharing and its implementation. We use the coast as a lens through which the analysis is framed because of the intricate governance challenges which coastal social–ecological systems present, the increasing development and exploitation pressures on these systems, and the growing need to improve understanding about the way in which greater equity and reduced inequalities could reduce conflicts, protect coastal ecosystems, and ensure... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Coastal communities; Governance; Inequality; Power. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Brockhaus, Maria; Center for International Forestry Research; m.brockhaus@cgiar.org; Di Gregorio, Monica; University of Leeds, Sustainability Research Institute; m.digregorio@leeds.ac.uk; Carmenta, Rachel; Center for International Forestry Research; R.Carmenta@cgiar.org. |
| Policy making is often neither rational nor solution-oriented, but driven by negotiations of interests of multiple actors that increasingly tend to take place in policy networks. Such policy networks integrate societal actors beyond the state, which all aim, to different degrees, at influencing ongoing policy processes and outcomes. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) can be considered as such an emerging policy domain, in which actors cooperate and conflict in network structures, build coalitions and try to control information and finance flows relevant for REDD+ decision making. This special feature is the result of an extensive comparative research effort to investigate national level REDD+ policy processes and emerging... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Agency; Climate change; Comparative analysis; Discourse coalitions; Policy network analysis; Power; REDD+; SNA; Transformational change. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Whaley, Luke; Water Science Institute, Cranfield University; l.whaley@cranfield.ac.uk; Weatherhead, Edward K.; Water Science Institute, Cranfield University; k.weatherhead@cranfield.ac.uk. |
| Scholars of comanagement are faced with a difficult methodological challenge. As comanagement has evolved and diversified it has increasingly merged with the field of adaptive management and related concepts that derive from resilience thinking and complex adaptive systems theory. In addition to earlier considerations of power sharing, institution building, and trust, the adaptive turn in comanagement has brought attention to the process of social learning and a focus on concepts such as scale, self-organization, and system trajectory. At the same time, a number of scholars are calling for a more integrated approach to studying (adaptive) comanagement that is able to situate these normative concepts within a critical understanding of how context and power... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Comanagement; Adaptive comanagement; IAD Framework; Politicized IAD Framework; Methodology; Institutions; Power; Discourse; Resilience. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Ratner, Blake D.; WorldFish; b.ratner@cgiar.org; Cohen, Philippa; ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University; WorldFish; p.cohen@cgiar.org; Barman, Benoy; WorldFish; b.barman@cgiar.org; Mam, Kosal; WorldFish; k.mam@cgiar.org; Nagoli, Joseph; WorldFish; j.nagoli@cgiar.org; Allison, Edward H.; School of International Development, University of East Anglia; WorldFish; e.allison@cgiar.org. |
| Aquatic agricultural systems in developing countries face increasing competition from multiple stakeholders over rights to access and use natural resources, land, water, wetlands, and fisheries, essential to rural livelihoods. A key implication is the need to strengthen governance to enable equitable decision making amidst competition that spans sectors and scales, building capacities for resilience, and for transformations in institutions that perpetuate poverty. In this paper we provide a simple framework to analyze the governance context for aquatic agricultural system development focused on three dimensions: stakeholder representation, distribution of power, and mechanisms of accountability. Case studies from Cambodia, Bangladesh, Malawi/Mozambique,... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Accountability; Bangladesh; Cambodia; Civil society; Coastal zone management; Environmental governance; Livelihoods; Malawi; Mozambique; Power; Social-ecological resilience; Solomon Islands; Stakeholder representation; Wetlands. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Fabinyi, Michael; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University; michael.fabinyi@jcu.edu.au; Evans, Louisa; Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter; louisa.evans@exeter.ac.uk; Foale, Simon J; Department of Anthropology, Archaeology and Sociology, James Cook University; simon.foale@jcu.edu.au. |
| A social-ecological system (SES) framework increasingly underpins the “resilience paradigm.” As with all models, the SES comes with particular biases. We explore these key biases. We critically examine how the SES resilience literature has attempted to define and analyze the social arena. We argue that much SES literature defines people’s interests and livelihoods as concerned primarily with the environment, and thereby underplays the role of other motivations and social institutions. We also highlight the SES resilience literature’s focus on institutions and organized social units, which misses key aspects of social diversity and power. Our key premise is the importance of inter- and multi-disciplinary perspectives.... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Anthropology; Political ecology; Power; Social diversity; Social-ecological system. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Registros recuperados: 55 | |
|
|
|
