|
|
|
|
|
| Stinchcombe, John; Brown University; John_Stinchcombe@brown.edu; Moyle, Leonie C; Duke University, Biology Department; lcm6@duke.edu; Hudgens, Brian R; Duke University, Biology Department;; Bloch, Philip L; ;; Chinnadurai, Sathya; ;; Morris, William F; ;. |
| Despite the volume of the academic conservation biology literature, there is little evidence as to what effect this work is having on endangered species recovery efforts. Using data collected from a national review of 136 endangered and threatened species recovery plans, we evaluated whether recovery plans were changing in response to publication trends in four areas of the academic conservation biology literature: metapopulation dynamics, population viability analysis, conservation corridors, and conservation genetics. We detected several changes in recovery plans in apparent response to publication trends in these areas (e.g., the number of tasks designed to promote the recovery of an endangered species shifted, although these tasks were rarely assigned... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Conservation biology; Conservation corridors; Conservation genetics; Endangered species; Endangered Species Act; Influential papers; Population Viability Analysis; PVA; Recovery plans. |
| Ano: 2002 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
