|
|
|
|
|
| Krause, Torsten; Lund University Centre of Excellence for Integration of Social and Natural Dimensions of Sustainability; torsten.krause@lucid.lu.se; Collen, Wain; International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics; awcollen@gmail.com; Nicholas, Kimberly A.; Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies; kimberly.nicholas.academic@gmail.com. |
| Critics suggest that Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) may not generate improvements in well-being for participating stakeholders, and may in fact undermine indigenous rights. To ensure positive social benefits from REDD+ projects, the United Nations REDD Programme has proposed core safeguards, including local stakeholder participation; free, prior, and informed consent; and equitable distribution of benefits. However, there is little experience to date in implementing and evaluating these safeguards. We apply these core safeguards as a framework to study how people in indigenous communities in the Ecuadorian Amazon perceive and benefit from Programa Socio Bosque, a conservation incentive program in Ecuador’s... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed article |
Palavras-chave: Benefit distribution; Deforestation; Ecuador; Forest governance; Payment for Ecosystem Services; Programa Socio Bosque; REDD+; Safeguards. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
