|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Amanor-Boadu, Vincent. |
| Despite their critical importance to the scientific enterprise, reviewers receive no formal training and reviewing has become a skill that they pick up through trial and error. Additionally, because most reviewers do not receive any feedback on their performance, any bad reviewing habits become entrenched over time. This has contributed to significant and unnecessary anxiety about reviewing and to antagonistic encounters between reviewers and authors. This paper seeks to correct this situation by defining reviewers as co-creators of scholarship and the reviewing as a quality control process in the production of scientific scholarship. The paper provides three groups of activities aimed at creating the right mindset among reviewers to facilitate this... |
| Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Reviewers; Reviewing; Scientific enterprise; Scholarship; Co-creations; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession. |
| Ano: 2010 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/93560 |
| |
|
|
| Doye, Damona G.. |
| Although opportunities and challenges for the Cooperative Extension Service have been addressed in the agricultural economics literature, little attention has been paid to the extension scholar. This article relates Boyer’s scholarship concepts and subsequent scholarship assessment articles to agricultural economics extension and describes some unique features of the extension scholar’s operating environment. Organizational framework, leadership, staffing, funding, accountability, and evaluation are addressed. Data from a survey of agricultural economics department heads are used to supplement personal experience in describing the current operating environment and constraints for extension scholars. |
| Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Extension; Scholarship; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession; Q16. |
| Ano: 2006 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/43756 |
| |
|
|
|
