Home Itens selecionados Provedores de dados OAI Créditos Sobre Ajuda

			Busca avançada
	Provedor de dados Agronomy (2) BJMBR (2) Infoteca-e (1) Rev. Bras. Bot. (1) Autor Lima, Renan Cardoso de (2) Mizubuti, Eduardo Seiti Gomide (2) Vieira, Rogerio Faria (2) Bousfield,D. (1) CINTRA, M. A. M. de U. (1) LIMA, E. C. N. Z. (1) Leta,J. (1) Scarano,Fabio Rubio (1) Sorenson,M.M. (1) Vasconcelos,S.M.R. (1) Mais... Palavra-chave Scientific writing (6) Conclusion (2) Discussion section (2) Writing the discussion (2) Bibliographic description (1) Citation frequency (1) Education (1) English proficiency (1) Impact factor (1) International journals (1) Reading (1) Redação técnico-científica (1) Referência bibliográfica (1) Research failure (1) Research output (1) Science in Brazil (1) Science policy (1) Scientific journals (1) Scientific literacy (1) Mais... Tipo do documento Info:eu-repo/semantics/article (3) Info:eu-repo/semantics/other (2) Documentos (INFOTECA-E) (1) Ano 2019 (2) 2009 (1) 2008 (1) 2007 (1) 2000 (1) País Brazil (6) Idioma Inglês (5) Português (1)		Ordenar por:  Relevância Autor Título Ano Registros recuperados: 6 Primeira ... 1 ... Última Guia para publicação de trabalhos apresentados em cursos da Embrapa Gado de Corte. Infoteca-e LIMA, E. C. N. Z.; CINTRA, M. A. M. de U.. Preparo do artigo. Diagramação do conteudo. A pecuária de corte no Brasil. Autores. Texto. Introdução. Possíveis cenários futuros. Quanto ao manejo do rebanho. Tabelas. Figuras. Referências bibliográficas. Livro. Tese. Publicação pertencente a uma série. Capítulo de livro. Artigo de periódico. Trabalhos apresentados em eventos. Tipo: Documentos (INFOTECA-E) Palavras-chave: Redação técnico-científica; Referência bibliográfica; Scientific writing; Bibliographic description. Ano: 2000 URL: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/325131 Why publish? Rev. Bras. Bot. Scarano,Fabio Rubio. This paper forwards an opinion about authors' and journals' motivations for scientific writing. Personal and institutional motivations are listed and discussed and, in regard to biodiversity sciences, I propose that a nationalistic motivation is also pertinent in a biodiversity-rich country such as Brazil. Curiosity and competitiveness should be combined for better results. Finally I discuss ground-breaking science within a post-modern perspective, and how the mere act of scientific writing might trigger both scientific and social revolutions. Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/article Palavras-chave: Citation frequency; Impact factor; Science in Brazil; Scientific journals; Scientific writing. Ano: 2008 URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-84042008000100017 How to write the discussion section of a scientific article Agronomy Vieira, Rogerio Faria; Lima, Renan Cardoso de; Mizubuti, Eduardo Seiti Gomide. he Discussion is the hardest section of a scientific article to write, as cognitive skills must be used to properly contextualize the findings of a study. In this article, we guide scientific writers, particularly unexperienced ones, on how to structure a Discussion section based on an article by Docherty and Smith (1999). According to these authors, a discussion should be prepared by organizing information in the following order: (a) statement of principal findings; (b) strengths and weaknesses of the study; (c) strengths and weaknesses in relation to other studies, discussing particularly any differences in results; (d) meaning of the study: possible mechanisms and implications; and (e) unanswered questions and future research. Each component of this... Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/article Palavras-chave: Writing the discussion; Discussion section; Conclusion; Scientific writing. Ano: 2019 URL: http://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42621 How to write the discussion section of a scientific article Agronomy Vieira, Rogerio Faria; Lima, Renan Cardoso de; Mizubuti, Eduardo Seiti Gomide. he Discussion is the hardest section of a scientific article to write, as cognitive skills must be used to properly contextualize the findings of a study. In this article, we guide scientific writers, particularly unexperienced ones, on how to structure a Discussion section based on an article by Docherty and Smith (1999). According to these authors, a discussion should be prepared by organizing information in the following order: (a) statement of principal findings; (b) strengths and weaknesses of the study; (c) strengths and weaknesses in relation to other studies, discussing particularly any differences in results; (d) meaning of the study: possible mechanisms and implications; and (e) unanswered questions and future research. Each component of this... Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/article Palavras-chave: Writing the discussion; Discussion section; Conclusion; Scientific writing. Ano: 2019 URL: http://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42621 Scientist-friendly policies for non-native English-speaking authors: timely and welcome BJMBR Vasconcelos,S.M.R.; Sorenson,M.M.; Leta,J.. That English is the lingua franca of today's science is an indisputable fact. Publication in English in international journals is a pre-requisite for a research paper to gain visibility in academia. However, English proficiency appears to be taken for granted in the scientific community, though this language can be a hurdle for a number of authors, particularly from non-native English-speaking countries. The influence of English proficiency on the publication output of Brazilian authors has never been assessed. We report our preliminary data on the relationship between the English proficiency of 51,223 researchers registered in the CNPq database and their publication output in international journals. We have found that publication rates are higher for... Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/other Palavras-chave: Science policy; Research output; English proficiency; International journals; Scientific writing; Education. Ano: 2007 URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2007000600001 Identifying reasons for failure in biomedical research and publishing BJMBR Bousfield,D.. The regular assessment of Brazilian scientific output means that individual university departments need to constantly improve the quantity and quality of their scientific output. A significant proportion of this output involves the work of Master’s and Doctoral students, but getting this work published in a suitable journal can often prove to be a challenge. Although students’ lack of fluency in English is a contributing factor, many of the problems observed have an early origin in the formulation of the research problem and its relevance to current research trends in the international literature. In short, more time needs to be spent in the library and less in the laboratory, and more effort needs to be made in teaching students basic research skills such... Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/other Palavras-chave: Research failure; Reading; Scientific writing; Scientific literacy. Ano: 2009 URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2009000700001 Registros recuperados: 6 Primeira ... 1 ... Última

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610 Política de Privacidade Área restrita		Embrapa Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n° Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901 Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco