Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Ordenar por: 

RelevânciaAutorTítuloAnoImprime registros no formato resumido
Registros recuperados: 5
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Special and Differential Treatment: A Mechanism to Promote Development? AgEcon
Kerr, William A..
Much has been made of "special and differential" treatment in the Doha Development Round of WTO negotiations. In particular, a conscious effort has been made to infer that special and differential treatment will promote development. While special and differential treatment may be a necessary evil given developing countries' higher adjustment costs, dignifying it as a development mechanism plays into the hands of protectionist interests. In particular, by allowing a general increase in the ability of developing countries to isolate their economies, it may reduce the efficacy of important forces that prod institutional reforms in developing countries. As institutional reform is one of the keys to economic development, lionizing special and differential...
Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Development; Institutional reform; Protectionism; Special and differential treatment; WTO; International Development.
Ano: 2005 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/23896
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Special and Differential Treatment in the GATT: A Pyrrhic Victory for Developing Countries AgEcon
Christie, Andrew.
Preferential measures for developing countries implemented within the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade failed to achieve their purported goal of facilitating economic development; this failure was due to their weak theoretical underpinnings and poor policy design. Not only were the demands developing countries made for discriminatory preferences largely ineffectual, their demands for preferential treatment, together with their forgoing full participation in the multilateral trading system, fundamentally reduced the obligation of developed countries to consider the interests of developing countries in future negotiation rounds. Thus the winning of preferences was rendered a pyrrhic victory for developing countries.
Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Economic development; Trade liberalization; GATT; Special and differential treatment; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; International Development; International Relations/Trade; Political Economy.
Ano: 2009 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/55900
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
The Doha Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations and the Developing Economies AgEcon
Das, Dilip K..
After years of sitting on the fence, developing economies became active participants in the multilateral trade negotiations (MTNs) during the Uruguay Round. In particular, the Group-of-twenty-one (G-21) developing economies played a consequential role both at the Fifth Ministerial Conference in Cancún and at the WTO meeting held in Geneva in the last week of July 2004, which put together the framework agreement, or so-called July package. As the Doha Round is intended to be a development round, development concerns form an integral part not only of the Doha Ministerial Declaration but also of the subsequent framework agreement. This article focuses on the initiatives of the developing economies in the Doha Round of MTNs and calibrates their achievements -...
Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Developing economies; Doha Round; Group-of-twenty-one; Multilateral trade negotiations; Special and differential treatment; International Relations/Trade.
Ano: 2005 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/23892
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Global Markets and Rural Poverty: Do the Rural Poor Gain or Lose from Globalization? AgEcon
Thomas, Clive Y.; Davis, Carlton George.
The paper advances the view that if global markets "worked" as theory suggests, then the answer to the question posed would be in the affirmative. Six reasons are given why this does not occur, namely: (1) the prevalence of trade manipulation; (2) the nature of markets in poor countries; (3) exceptions to neoclassical efficient market theory; (4) theoretical and empirical inconclusiveness regarding the relation between open trade policies and growth; (5) income inequality; and (6) the institutional framework of global trade. Trade in food and the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) for food security and poverty reduction illustrate the arguments and the paper concludes with some recommendations.
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Globalization; Market and/or policy failure; Millennium Development Goals (MDG); Neoclassical economics market efficiency theory; Poverty and food insecurity; Rent seeking behavior; Rural poor; Special and differential treatment; WTO Agreement on Agriculture (AOA); Food Security and Poverty; International Relations/Trade.
Ano: 2002 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/15713
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Special and Differential Treatment in the GATT: A Pyrrhic Victory for Developing Countries: Technical Annex AgEcon
Christie, Andrew.
This document is the technical annex to the full paper "Special and Differential Treatment in the GATT: A Pyrrhic Victory for Developing Countries" which is available separately.
Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Economic development; Trade liberalization; GATT; Special and differential treatment; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; International Development; International Relations/Trade; Political Economy.
Ano: 2009 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/55901
Registros recuperados: 5
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional