|
|
|
Registros recuperados: 10 | |
|
|
Caroppo, Carmela; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Taranto (Italy); carmela.caroppo@iamc.cnr.it; Giordano, Laura; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Naples (Italy); laura.giordano@iamc.cnr.it; Palmieri, Nadia; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Naples (Italy);; Bellio, Giovanna; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Taranto (Italy); giovannabellio@libero.it; Bisci, Antonio Paride; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Taranto (Italy); paride.bisci@iamc.cnr.it; Portacci, Giuseppe; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Taranto (Italy);; Sclafani, Patricia; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Naples (Italy); patricia.sclafani@iamc.cnr.it; Hopkins, Tom Sawyer; National Research Council - Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (CNR - IAMC), Naples (Italy);. |
Mar Piccolo of Taranto is an estuarine basin heavily exploited for commercial mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis L.) farming. The historical renown of the Taranto mussels has suffered over the last decade following policy decisions to expand the mussel farms and to relocate a portion of the urban sewage to an outfall outside of Mar Piccolo. The resulting decline in mussel quality and the quandary of how to restore stability to Taranto mussel production became the focal issue for our application of the systems approach framework (SAF). We simulated the ecological, economic, and social interactions that affect mussel production. Stakeholders and mussel farmers contributed by participating in meetings during the entire exercise. Our simulation analysis... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Aquaculture; Bioeconomical modeling; Carrying capacity; Estuarine ecosystem simulation; Mar Piccolo; Stakeholder involvement; Sustainability. |
Ano: 2012 |
|
| |
|
|
The increasing number of deteriorating old dams that need renovation or have lost their function make dam removal a viable management option. There are at least four major reasons for dam removal: safety, law and policy, economy, and ecology. Here we discuss 17 Swedish dams that were recently considered for removal. Because dam removal usually causes controversy, dam removal initiatives may succeed, fail, or result in a compromise such as a bypass channel for migrating fish. We identify and discuss three major obstructions to dam removal: funding, cultural-historical values, and threatened species. To facilitate dam removal, the reasons for, and the effects of, dam removal must be carefully explained, and the public and stakeholders must be kept... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Insight |
Palavras-chave: Controversies; Dam removal; Information; Obstructions; Reservoirs; Rivers; Stakeholder involvement; Sweden. |
Ano: 2009 |
|
| |
|
|
Konstantinou, Zoi I.; Division of Hydraulics and Environment, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; zkon@civil.auth.gr; Krestenitis, Yannis N.; Division of Hydraulics and Environment, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki ; ynkrest@civil.auth.gr; Latinopoulos, Dionysis; Department of Spatial Planning and Development, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki;; Pagou, Kalliopi; Hellenic Center for Marine Research, Institute of Oceanography;; Galinou-Mitsoudi, Sofia; Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki;; Savvidis, Yiannis; Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki;. |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Integrated management; Integrated modeling; Mussel farming; Stakeholder involvement; Systems Approach Framework (SAF) implementation. |
Ano: 2012 |
|
| |
|
|
Stringer, Lindsay C; University of Manchester; Lindsay.stringer@manchester.ac.uk; Dougill, Andrew J; University of Leeds; adougill@env.leeds.ac.uk; Fraser, Evan; University of Leeds; evan@env.leeds.ac.uk; Hubacek, Klaus; University of Leeds; hubacek@env.leeds.ac.uk; Prell, Christina; University of Sheffield; c.prell@sheffield.ac.uk; Reed, Mark S; University of Leeds; mreed@env.leeds.ac.uk. |
Adaptive management has the potential to make environmental management more democratic through the involvement of different stakeholders. In this article, we examine three case studies at different scales that followed adaptive management processes, critically reflecting upon the role of stakeholder participation in each case. Specifically, we examine at which stages different types of stakeholders can play key roles and the ways that each might be involved. We show that a range of participatory mechanisms can be employed at different stages of the adaptive cycle, and can work together to create conditions for social learning and favorable outcomes for diverse stakeholders. This analysis highlights the need for greater reflection on case study research in... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive management; Democratic governance; Participation; Stakeholder involvement. |
Ano: 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
Bijlsma, Rianne M.; University of Twente, The Netherlands; Deltares, The Netherlands; r.m.bijlsma@alumnus.utwente.nl; Bots, Pieter W. G.; Cemagref (UMR G-EAU); University of Delft, The Netherlands; p.w.g.bots@tudelft.nl; Wolters, Henk A.; Deltares, The Netherlands; henk.wolters@deltares.nl; Hoekstra, Arjen Y.; University of Twente, The Netherlands; a.y.hoekstra@utwente.nl. |
Stakeholder participation is advocated widely, but there is little structured, empirical research into its influence on policy development. We aim to further the insight into the characteristics of participatory policy development by comparing it to expert-based policy development for the same case. We describe the process of problem framing and analysis, as well as the knowledge base used. We apply an uncertainty perspective to reveal differences between the approaches and speculate about possible explanations. We view policy development as a continuous handling of substantive uncertainty and process uncertainty, and investigate how the methods of handling uncertainty of actors influence the policy development. Our findings suggest that the wider frame... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Environmental policy; Framing; Participation; Policy development; Policy process; Stakeholder involvement; Uncertainty. |
Ano: 2011 |
|
| |
|
|
Dinesen, Grete E.; Coastal Ecology Section, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark; gdi@aqua.dtu.dk; Timmermann, Karen; AU NERI, Roskilde;; Roth, Eva; SDU, Esbjerg;; Markager, Stiig; AU NERI, Roskilde;; Ravn-Jonsen, Lars; SDU, Esbjerg;; Hjorth, Morten; AU NERI, Roskilde;; Holmer, Marianne; SDU, Odense;. |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Aquaculture; Bioeconomical modeling; Blue mussels; Danish estuary; Eutrophication; Fishery; Integrated coastal system assessment; Stakeholder involvement. |
Ano: 2011 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Bacher, Cedric; Gangnery, Aline; Cugier, Philippe; Mongruel, Remi; Strand, Oivind; Frangoudes, Katia. |
The general purpose of assessment is to provide decision-makers with the best valuable data, information, and predictions with which management decisions will be supported. Using case studies taken from four scientific projects and dealing with the management of marine bivalve resources, lessons learned allowed identifying some issues regarding assessment approaches. The selected projects also introduced methodological or institutional frameworks: ecosystem approach to aquaculture (EAA), system approach framework (SAF), marine spatial planning (MSP), and valuation of ecosystem services (ES). The study on ecosystem services linked ES to marine habitats and identified ES availability and vulnerability to pressures. The results were displayed as maps of... |
Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Ecosystem services; Marine spatial planning; Ecosystem approach to aquaculture; System approach; Modeling; Stakeholder involvement. |
Ano: 2019 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00470/58138/60608.pdf |
| |
|
| |
Registros recuperados: 10 | |
|
|
|