|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 98 | |
|
| |
|
|
| Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted; Noe, Egon. |
| This paper describes a cross- and transdisciplinary approach to develop a multicriteria assessment framework that aims to help organic actors and stakeholders conduct, document and communicate balanced overall assessments of the effects of organic food systems on society and nature. The framework will be based on extensive analyses of existing methods for multicriteria assessment and communication, and the adaptation and development of selected methods to suit organic food systems and the principles organic agriculture. The validity and utility of the framework is secured through involvement of actors and participatory testing of prototypes in practice. The goal is to help sustain an integrated development of the organic production, contribute to open and... |
| Tipo: Conference paper, poster, etc. |
Palavras-chave: Technology assessment; Research methodology and philosophy. |
| Ano: 2011 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/19951/1/19951.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted; Noe, Egon; Smith, Peter; Lykke-Olesen, Andreas; Fog, Erik. |
| Imagine there is a platform that makes it possible to discuss organics between all parties in the organic food chain based on their individual criteria. The MultiTrust project has endeavoured to find a tool to solve this challenge: How to make overall assessments of the effects of organic production in such a way that they actually can make a difference in practice. Organic products have to compete against conventional products, and often the organic have difficulties comparing when measured on single criteria. The hall mark of organics is the holistic approach, considering many issues at the same time, and therefore there is a need for overall assessments. Overall assessments can be very complex and therefore difficult to communicate. And it can be... |
| Tipo: Video |
Palavras-chave: Knowledge management. |
| Ano: 2014 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/26849/1/MT_UK_v002.mp4 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Noe, Egon; Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted. |
| In our presentation we will focus on agroecology and the problems of sustainable agroecosystems regulation, by including a multiperspectival approach (Alrøe and Noe 2011) and a social systems theoretical perspective, based primarily on theories of Niklas Luhmann, Bruno Latour, and Charles Peirce. We will address two main challenges raised by our view on agroecology, the epistemological challenge of how to observe agroecosystems as a whole, and the ontological challenge of how to understand the existence of agroecosystems independently of perspectives. |
| Tipo: Conference paper, poster, etc. |
Palavras-chave: Farming Systems; Systems research and participatory research; Social aspects; Research methodology and philosophy. |
| Ano: 2013 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/25731/7/25731.pdf |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted; Noe, Egon. |
| Denne rapport belyser de normative aspekter som det er vigtigt at være opmærksom på ved udvikling af multikriterielle vurderingsmetoder. Der skelnes der mellem tre normative grundbegreber – værdi, kvalitet og etik, som ikke alene er relevante i forhold til selve vurderings- og udvælgelsesprocessen, men i høj grad også i forhold til hvilken måde de økologiske fødevaresystemer i udgangspunktet iagttages og beskrives. Iagttagelsen præges i dag ofte af en række fastsatte indikatorer, men bag dem findes der ’orientatorer’, som kan være fundamentale interesser, værdier, kriterier eller mål. Det er vigtigt at få dem frem i lyset og overvejet, hvordan de påvirker iagttagelsen og derigennem også vurderingerne. Når multikriterielle vurderingsværktøjer udvikles, er... |
| Tipo: Report |
Palavras-chave: Indicators and other value-laden measures; Technology assessment. |
| Ano: 2012 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/21217/3/21217.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Verhoog, Henk; Lund, Vonne; Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted. |
| In this chapter we first give an overview of different interpretations of animal welfare and their relation to different lay and expert approaches to animal welfare. The importance of values to animal welfare is discussed and confronted with the role of science and the scientific ideals of value-freedom and objectivity. The interpretations of animal welfare are then compared with different frameworks from bio-ethics, which can help clarify the moral aspects of animal welfare. The values of organic farming are then discussed as a departure point for a discussion of what a relevant view of animal welfare might be like, in the context of organic farming. This reveals obvious conflicts between different values within organic farming, and some of these dilemmas... |
| Tipo: Book chapter |
Palavras-chave: Research methodology and philosophy Values; Standards and certification Health and welfare. |
| Ano: 2004 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/207/1/Chap%2D02_Vonne_30_apr.doc |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted. |
| In order to develop better and more sustainable food systems, we need to make, and use, overall assessments of their effects, based on multiple criteria. This is a complex and very difficult task. Two of the main challenges are 1) how to balance very different types of assessments and avoid bias in favour of accurate knowledge and that which is easy to measure, and 2) how to communicate complex overall assessments in such a way they can be used in practice by different actors and stakeholders with different perspectives and values. Description: Alternative, more sustainable food systems are developed in relation to a plurality of societal objectives and ethical guidelines, such as the organic principles. The success of these alternatives depends on... |
| Tipo: Other |
Palavras-chave: Technology assessment; Food systems. |
| Ano: 2012 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/22134/7/22134.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Rasmussen, Jesper; Langer, Vibeke; Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted. |
| An analysis of peer reviews of 84 organic farming grant applications, submitted to The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS) in 2001 was carried out to investigate whether peer reviews were influenced by the peer reviewers’ affiliation to organic agriculture research and to what degree peer reviewers distinguish between scientific quality and societal relevance. Fifteen reviewers were grouped in three groups (1) scientists with affiliation to organic farming research, (2) scientists without affiliation to organic farming research and (3) users of the research. The scientist groups assessed societal relevance of the grant applications and scientific quality as a sum of three scientific criteria and the... |
| Tipo: Journal paper |
Palavras-chave: Research methodology and philosophy; Research communication and quality. |
| Ano: 2006 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/3087/1/Bias_in_peer_review.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Noe, Egon; Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted. |
| From a rural, sociological point of view no social theories have so far been able to grasp the ontological complexity and special character of a farm enterprise as an entity in a really satisfying way. The contention of this paper is that a combination of Luhmann’s theory of social systems and actor-network theory (ANT) of Latour, Callon, and Law offers a new and radical framework for understanding a farm as a self-organizing, heterogeneous system. Luhmann’s theory offers an approach to understand a farm as a self-organizing system (operating in meaning) that must produce and reproduce itself through demarcation from the surrounding world by selection of meaning. The meaning of the system is expressed through the goals, values, and the logic of the... |
| Tipo: Conference paper, poster, etc. |
Palavras-chave: Research methodology and philosophy. |
| Ano: 2003 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/778/1/Noe_alroe_openings_3may03.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Noe, Egon; Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted. |
| From a rural, sociological point of view no social theories have so far been able to grasp the ontological complexity and special character of a farm enterprise as an entity in a really satisfying way. The contention of this paper is that a combination of Luhmann’s theory of social systems and the actor-network theory (ANT) of Latour, Callon, and Law offers a new and radical framework for understanding a farm as a self-organizing, heterogeneous system. Luhmann’s theory offers an approach to understand a farm as a self-organizing system (operating in meaning) that must produce and reproduce itself through demarcation from the surrounding world by selection of meaning. The meaning of the system is expressed through the goals, values, and logic of the... |
| Tipo: Journal paper |
Palavras-chave: Systems research and participatory research. |
| Ano: 2006 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/324/1/Manus_cybernetics_Noe.doc |
| |
|
|
| Vaarst, Mette; Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted. |
| In 2005, The International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM) developed four new ethical principles of organic agriculture to guide its future development: the principles of health, ecology, care, and fairness. The key distinctive concept of animal welfare in organic agriculture combines naturalness and human care, and can be linked meaningfully with these principles. In practice, a number of challenges are connected with making organic livestock systems work. These challenges are particularly dominant in immature agro-ecological systems, for example those that are characterized by industrialization and monoculture. Some of the current challenges are partly created by shortages of land and manure, which encourage zero-grazing and other... |
| Tipo: Journal paper |
Palavras-chave: "Organics" in general Values; Standards and certification Health and welfare. |
| Ano: 2012 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/30615/1/vaarst-og-alr%C3%B8e-2012-concepts-of-animal-health-and-welfare.pdf |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted; Vaarst, Mette; Kristensen, Erik Steen. |
| The recent development and growth of organic livestock farming and the related development of national and international regulations has fuelled discussions among scientists and philosophers concerning the proper conceptualisation of animal welfare. These discussions on livestock welfare in organic farming draw on the conventional discussions and disputes on animal welfare, which involve issues such as different definitions of welfare (clinical health, absence of suffering, sum of positive and negative experiences, etc.), the possibility for objective measures of animal welfare and the acceptable level of welfare. It seems clear that livestock welfare is a value-laden concept and that animal welfare science cannot be made independent of questions of values... |
| Tipo: Journal paper |
Palavras-chave: Values; Standards and certification Health and welfare. |
| Ano: 2001 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/430/1/Organic_welfare__preprint__5mar01.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Alrøe, Hugo Fjelsted; Vaarst, Mette; Kristensen, Erik Steen. |
| Der foregår løbende både praktisk udvikling og teoretisk refleksion i relation til husdyrvelfærd. Endvidere evalueres og ændres reglerne omkring husdyrvelfærd løbende, både i Danmark og i EU. Formålet med nærværende kapitel er at diskutere begrebet husdyrvelfærd i forbindelse med principperne i det økologisk jordbrug. Det sker med udgangspunkt i spørgsmålet: er der, ud over de gældende regler, særlige værdimæssige, etiske, videnskabelige eller reguleringsmæssige forhold, der influerer på hvordan dyrevelfærd opfattes i økologisk jordbrug, set i forhold til det øvrige jordbrug? Eller med andre ord: kan de nuværende forskelle i regler, og i opfattelsen af dyrevelfærd, begrundes i mere grundliggende forhold i økologisk jordbrug? Og i så fald: i hvilken retning... |
| Tipo: Report chapter |
Palavras-chave: Farming Systems; Health and welfare. |
| Ano: 2000 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/13756/1/13756.pdf |
| |
| Registros recuperados: 98 | |
|
|
|
