|
|
|
|
|
| Marchal, Paul; Andersen, Jesper Levring; Aranda, Martin; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Goti, Leyre; Guyader, Olivier; Haraldsson, Gunnar; Hatcher, Aaron; Hegland, Troels Jacob; Le Floc H, Pascal; Macher, Claire; Malvarosa, Loretta; Maravelias, Christos D.; Mardle, Simon; Murillas, Arantza; Nielsen, J. Rasmus; Sabatella, Rosaria; Smith, Anthony D. M.; Stokes, Kevin; Thoegersen, Thomas; Ulrich, Clara. |
| This study compares the details and performance of fisheries management between the EU and a selection of other countries worldwide: Iceland, New Zealand, and Australia, which are considered in many respects to be among the most advanced in the world in fisheries management. Fisheries management in the EU, Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand has developed following different paths, despite being based on similar instruments and principles. Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand have been at the forefront of developing management practices such as stakeholder involvement, legally binding management targets (Australia, New Zealand), individual transferable quotas, and discard bans (Iceland, New Zealand). The EU has since the beginning of the 21st century taken... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Australia; Comparative review; European Union; Fisheries management; Iceland; New Zealand. |
| Ano: 2016 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00312/42305/41699.pdf |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Uriarte, Andres; Zarauz, Lucia; Aranda, Martin; Santurtun, Marina; Iriondo, Ane; Berthou, Patrick; Castro, Jose; Delayat, Stephanie; Falcon, Jesus; Garcia, Javier; Gaspar, Miguel; Gonzalez, J.f.; Jimenez, Sebastian; Lordan, Colm; Morandeau, Gilles; Sanchez, Florence; Santamaria, Maria Theresa; Villegas, Noemi. |
| The objective of fisheries management is the sustainable exploitation of the fish resources over the extent of their spatial distribution. Along with the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) objectives, the socio-economic viability of the fisheries exploiting the resource is also to be achieved. To reach these aims, managers need to define the management units they are going to work with. For the purpose of GEPETO project, we define a management unit (MU) as the set of fishing fleets exploiting a common pool of fish resources with strong spatial overlapping and sharing of habitats, which make them being typically fished together. In other words, a MU is the set of fishing fleets exploiting a common fish community over their spatial distribution. MUs have to be... |
| Tipo: Text |
|
| Ano: 2014 |
URL: http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00222/33298/31742.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Le Floc'H, Pascal; Murillas, Arantza; Aranda, Martin; Daures, Fabienne; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Guyader, Olivier; Hatcher, Aaron; Macher, Claire; Marchal, Paul. |
| A survey of past and existing management measures applied to different fisheries in European Western Waters is analyzed as a typology of co-management between governments and stakeholders. Faced with increasing constraints on accessing fish stocks, management measures have evolved toward fishing rights individualization, limited access and various other specific measures. Restrictions on access have changed fishermen’s behaviour in several significant ways. A comparative analysis, based on qualitative data collected through interviews and focus groups, is developed for fisheries from the following European countries: France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom. Past and existing individual harvesting rights in the four countries are reviewed and compared. |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Management; Fishery governance; Common Fishery Policy (CFP). |
| Ano: 2015 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00248/35912/34455.pdf |
| |
|
|
|
