|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Lundholm, Cecilia; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Teaching & Learning in the Social Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; cecilia.lundholm@cesam.su.se; Crona, Beatrice; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; beatrice.crona@stockholmresilience.su.se; Chabay, Ilan; Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany; Helmholtz Alliance on Sustainability and Social Compatibility of Future Energy Infrastructure, University of Stuttgart, Germany; ilan.chabay@gmail.com. |
| Adaptive comanagement (ACM) has been suggested as the way to successfully achieve sustainable environmental governance. Despite excellent research, the field still suffers from underdeveloped frameworks of causality. To address this issue, we suggest a framework that integrates the structural frame of Plummer and Fitzgibbons’ “adaptive comanagement” with the specific process characteristics of Senecah’s “Trinity of Voice.” The resulting conceptual hybrid is used to guide the comparison of two cases of stakeholder participation in fisheries management—the Swedish Co-management Initiative and the Polish Fisheries Roundtable. We examine how different components of preconditions and the... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Fisheries; Fisheries governance; Learning; Participation; Stakeholder dialogue; Trinity of Voice. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
|
