Home Itens selecionados Provedores de dados OAI Créditos Sobre Ajuda

			Busca avançada
	Provedor de dados OAK (29) Autor 澤田, 学 (29) Sawada, Manabu (9) SAWADA, Manabu (7) 伊藤, 繁 (5) 耕野, 拓一 (5) 樋口, 昭則 (4) 金山, 紀久 (4) 仙北谷, 康 (3) 佐藤, 和夫 (3) 小山, 賢一 (3) 川瀬, 智太郎 (3) 香川, 文庸 (3) AIZAKI, Hideo (2) SATO, Kazuo (2) 中村, 利雄 (2) 原口, 勝全 (2) 合崎, 英男 (2) 徐, 世旭 (2) HILL, Glen (1) KADOHIRA, Mutsuyo (1) Mais... Palavra-chave 消費者評価 (3) 牛肉 (3) 選択実験 (3) BSE (2) BSE検査 (2) Beef (2) Demand for fresh meat (2) Food safety (2) 公共育成牧場 (2) 支払意志額 (2) 生鮮肉需要 (2) 食品安全性 (2) 2段階支出配分 (1) Beef demand (1) Best-Worst scaling method (1) Best-Worst 尺度構成法 (1) CVM (1) Choice experiment (1) Choice experiments (1) Cluster analysis (1) Mais... Ano 2014 (1) 2012 (1) 2011 (1) 2010 (1) 2009 (2) 2008 (1) 2007 (1) 2006 (2) 2005 (1) 2004 (1) 2003 (4) 2002 (2) 2001 (1) 1998 (1) 1995 (1) 1993 (1) 1991 (1) 1990 (1) 1989 (2) 1988 (1) Mais... País Japan (29) Idioma Japonês (27) Inglês (2)		Registro completo Provedor de dados:  OAK País:  Japan Título:  Price policies for upland field crops and the new farrn subsidy scheme for the stabilization of farrn businesses : A comparison of Japan, the EU and the U.S. 畑作物価格政策の展開と品目横断的経営安定対策 : 欧米との比較 Autores:  澤田, 学 Data:  2007-03-01 Ano:  2007 Resumo:  On October 27，2005，the Ministry of Agriculture，Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) announced the outline of a new farm subsidy program that incorporates non-product specific farm business stabilization measures (Japanese-style direct payments)，which is scheduled to commence in fiscal year 2007. This represents a shift from product specific price support policies embracing all producers，to an income policy with a focus on core farming entities. The purpose of this article is to clarify the characteristics of the new measures through a comparison with the direct payment programs of the United State and European Union (EU) and the examination of the new scheme's consistency with WTO agreements，and to point out the issues regarding the implementation. Some of the Japanese-style direct payments are linked to current production to facilitate the expansion of farm size; hence，they might be subject to some reduction commitments as “amber box" payments under WTO Agriculture Agreement. Moreover，a reduction in the burden on the consumer by this policy shift is not expected since the subsidy will be financed by a surcharge or markup on imports，as it is now，as well as funds from Japan's national budget. Unlike a price support program，it is clear how much of a subsidy an entity receives under a direct payment program. Thus，MAFF is accountable to consumers and taxpayers for the introduction and effects of these new measures. Finally，it is necessary under the new farm subsidy scheme for farm organizations，such as the Hokkaido Union of Agricultural Cooperatives，to effectively provide a supply management function for upland field crops so as not to lose the trust of the markets by having a surplus or shortage. 2005年度秋季大会シンポジウム 本文タイトルに誤りあり Idioma:  Japonês Identificador:  http://ir.obihiro.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10322/2825 Editor:  北海道農業経済学会 Formato:  application/pdf application/pdf Direitos:  北海道農業経済学会 Fechar

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610 Política de Privacidade Área restrita		Embrapa Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n° Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901 Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco