Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Registro completo
Provedor de dados:  ArchiMer
País:  France
Título:  Performance of viruses and bacteriophages for fecal source determination in a multi-laboratory, comparative study
Autores:  Harwood, Valerie J.
Boehm, Alexandria B.
Sassoubre, Lauren M.
Vijayavel, Kannappan
Stewart, Jill R.
Fong, Theng-theng
Caprais, Marie-paule
Converse, Reagan R.
Diston, David
Ebdon, James
Fuhrman, Jed A.
Gourmelon, Michele
Gentry-shields, Jennifer
Griffith, John F.
Kashian, Donna R.
Noble, Rachel T.
Taylor, Huw
Wicki, Melanie
Data:  2013-11
Ano:  2013
Palavras-chave:  Virus
Bacteriophage
Water quality
Fecal pollution
Validation
Resumo:  An inter-laboratory study of the accuracy of microbial source tracking (MST) methods was conducted using challenge fecal and sewage samples that were spiked into artificial freshwater and provided as unknowns (blind test samples) to the laboratories. The results of the Source Identification Protocol Project (SIPP) are presented in a series of papers that cover 41 MST methods. This contribution details the results of the virus and bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal or sewage contamination. Human viruses used as source identifiers included adenoviruses (HAdV), enteroviruses (EV), norovirus Groups I and II (NoVI and NoVII), and polyomaviruses (HPyVs). Bacteriophages were also employed, including somatic coliphages and F-specific RNA bacteriophages (FRNAPH) as general indicators of fecal contamination. Bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal sources included genotyping of FRNAPH isolates and plaque formation on bacterial hosts Enterococcus faecium MB-55, Bacteroides HB-73 and Bacteroides GB-124. The use of small sample volumes (<= 50 ml) resulted in relatively insensitive theoretical limits of detection (10-50 gene copies or plaques x 50 ml(-1)) which, coupled with low virus concentrations in samples, resulted in high false-negative rates, low sensitivity, and low negative predictive values. On the other hand, the specificity of the human virus methods was generally close to 100% and positive predictive values were similar to 40-70% with the exception of NoVs, which were not detected. The bacteriophage methods were generally much less specific toward human sewage than virus methods, although FRNAPH II genotyping was relatively successful, with 18% sensitivity and 85% specificity. While the specificity of the human virus methods engenders great confidence in a positive result, better concentration methods and larger sample volumes must be utilized for greater accuracy of negative results, i.e. the prediction that a human contamination source is absent.
Tipo:  Text
Idioma:  Inglês
Identificador:  http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00171/28197/27786.pdf

DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.064
Editor:  Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd
Relação:  http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00171/28197/
Formato:  application/pdf
Fonte:  Water Research (0043-1354) (Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd), 2013-11 , Vol. 47 , N. 18 , P. 6929-6943
Direitos:  2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Fechar
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional