| Registro completo |
| Provedor de dados: |
Ecology and Society
|
| País: |
Canada
|
| Título: |
Ecosystem service delivery in restoration projects: the effect of ecological succession on the benefits of tidal marsh restoration
|
| Autores: |
Boerema, Annelies; Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp; annelies.boerema@uantwerpen.be
Geerts, Lindsay; Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp; lindsay.geerts@uantwerpen.be
Oosterlee, Lotte; Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp; lotte.oosterlee@uantwerpen.be
Temmerman, Stijn; Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp; stijn.temmerman@uantwerpen.be
Meire, Patrick; Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp; patrick.meire@uantwerpen.be
|
| Data: |
2016-04-25
|
| Ano: |
2016
|
| Palavras-chave: |
Long-term benefits
Managed coastal realignment (MR)
Marsh succession
Monetary valuation
Temporal scale
|
| Resumo: |
Long-term assessment of ecosystem restoration projects is complex because of ecological processes such as succession, particularly in highly dynamic ecosystems such as estuaries. Restoration of intertidal flats and marshes on formerly embanked land, often called managed coastal realignment (MR), became popular in estuarine management. In our study, biophysical and monetary data were collected to calculate the value of 15 (sub)ecosystem services (ES) delivered by a large tidal marsh restoration project in the Schelde estuary in Belgium and the Netherlands. We hypothesized that ES delivery changes over time due to ecological succession and hence the long-term benefits are subject to this phenomenon and need to be taken into consideration. A marsh sediment accretion model (MARSED) was used to simulate potential marsh succession scenarios. In this way, the temporal evolution of ES delivery caused by ecological succession could be evaluated. Our study shows that benefits during successional marsh stages could actually be higher than for marshes in equilibrium. This finding does not suggest that ecosystems in transition always have a higher value than systems in equilibrium, but emphasizes the need to consider long-term ecological dynamics, such as succession, in a benefit assessment for restoration projects.
|
| Tipo: |
Peer-Reviewed Reports
|
| Idioma: |
Inglês
|
| Identificador: |
vol21/iss2/art10/
|
| Editor: |
Resilience Alliance
|
| Formato: |
text/html application/pdf
|
| Fonte: |
Ecology and Society; Vol. 21, No. 2 (2016)
|
|
