| Registro completo |
| Provedor de dados: |
Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo
|
| País: |
Brazil
|
| Título: |
Comparison of estimation methods of soil strength in five soils
|
| Autores: |
Ajayi,Ayodele Ebenezer
Dias Junior,Moacir de Souza
Curi,Nilton
Araujo Junior,Cezar Francisco
Aladenola,Olanike Olaiya
Teixeira Souza,Thiago Tadeu
Inda Junior,Alberto Vasconcellos
|
| Data: |
2009-06-01
|
| Ano: |
2009
|
| Palavras-chave: |
Penetration resistance
Preconsolidation pressure
Load support capacity
|
| Resumo: |
In agriculture, the soil strength is used to describe the susceptibility to deformation by pressure caused by agricultural machine. The purpose of this study was to compare different methods for estimating the inherent soil strength and to identify their suitability for the evaluation of load support capacity, compaction susceptibility and root growth. The physical, chemical, mineralogical and intrinsic strength properties of seven soil samples, collected from five sampling pits at different locations in Brazil, were measured. Four clay (CS) and three sandy clay loam (SCL) soils were used. The clay soils were collected on a farm in Santo Ângelo, RS (28 º 16 ' 16 '' S; 54 º 13 ' 11 '' W 290 m); A and B horizons at the Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG (21 º 13 ' 47 '' S; 44 º 58 ' 6'' W; 918 m) and on the farm Sygenta, in Uberlandia, MG (18 º 58 ' 37 '' S; 48 º 12 ' 05 '' W 866 m). The sandy clay loam soils were collected in Aracruz, ES (19 º 47 ' 10 '' S; 40 º 16 ' 29 '' W 81 m), and on the farm Xavier, Lavras, MG (21 º 13 ' 24 '' S; 45 º 05 ' 00 '' W; 844 m). Soil strength was estimated based on measurements of: (a) a pneumatic consolidometer, (b) manual pocket (non-rotating) penetrometer; and (c) automatic (rotating) penetrometer. The results of soil strength properties were similar by the three methods. The soil structure had a significant influence on soil strength. Results of measurements with both the manual pocket and the electric penetrometer were similar, emphasizing the influence of soil texture. The data showed that, to enhance the reliability of predictions of preconsolidation pressure by penetrometers, it is better to separate the soils into the different classes, rather than analyze them jointly. It can be concluded that the consolidometer method, although expensive, is the best when evaluations of load support capacity and compaction susceptibility of soil samples are desired.
|
| Tipo: |
Info:eu-repo/semantics/article
|
| Idioma: |
Inglês
|
| Identificador: |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832009000300002
|
| Editor: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
|
| Relação: |
10.1590/S0100-06832009000300002
|
| Formato: |
text/html
|
| Fonte: |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.33 n.3 2009
|
| Direitos: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
|
|
