Sabiia Seb
PortuguêsEspañolEnglish
Embrapa
        Busca avançada

Botão Atualizar


Botão Atualizar

Ordenar por: 

RelevânciaAutorTítuloAnoImprime registros no formato resumido
Registros recuperados: 5
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
When is Arsenic Poisoning Prevention Unaffordable? Determining the EPA 'Affordability Criteria' for Small Water Systems Under the 1996 Clean Drinking Water Act 31
Cooke, Stephen C..
Why would anyone want lower quality drinking water? The Safe Drinking Water Act allows an "affordability, variance technology, small system variance exemption" to the drinking water standards based on a supply side argument. It assumes small drinking water systems have significant diseconomies of scale in meeting the maximum contaminant levels. We can test this assumption by examining the cost of compliance technologies by system size developed by the Environmental Protection Agency to meet the mcl for arsenic. The data show that the least costly arsenic reduction technology to meet the current mcl of 10 parts per billion (ppb) is modify coagulation/filtration. This technology is also six to seven times more expensive to implement for very small systems...
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Environmental Economics and Policy.
Ano: 2005 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/19374
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
ECONOMIES OF SIZE IN U.S. CROP PRODUCTION 31
Cooke, Stephen C.; Sundquist, W. Burt.
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper Palavras-chave: Crop Production/Industries.
Ano: 1988 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/13564
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
Cost Structures, Productivities and the Distribution of Technology Benefits Among Producers for Major U.S. Field Crops 31
Cooke, Stephen C.; Sundquist, W. Burt.
The purpose of this paper is to estimate the cost structures and resource productivities involved in production of four major U.S. field crops and to estimate the distribution among producers of benefits from production related technology. These field crops include corn, soybeans, wheat and cotton grown in selected homogeneous soil and rainfall areas of the U.S. The cost structure of each commodity is estimated relative to a Cobb-Douglas cost function. Productivity is assessed across time, regions and size of enterprise. The distribution of technology benefits is determined by region and enterprise size for each commodity.
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Crop Production/Industries; Productivity Analysis; Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies.
Ano: 1987 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/50020
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
MEASURING AND EXPLAINING THE DECLINE IN U.S. COTTON PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH 31
Cooke, Stephen C.; Sundquist, W. Burt.
Tornquist input quantity indices were used to derive total and partial factor productivity measures for U.S. cotton across time, region, and scale. Total factor productivity for U.S. cotton increased .2 percent per year between 1974 and 1982. Partial productivity measures revealed that yield growth was about .6 percent and input use grew about .4 percent per year. Cotton enterprises in Alabama and Mississippi gained and those in the Texas High Plains lost competitive advantage relative to California. In 1982, very large (1750-5900 acres) and large (950-1749 acres) cotton enterprises were 2 percent more productive than medium-size enterprises (570-949 acres).
Tipo: Journal Article Palavras-chave: Productivity Analysis.
Ano: 1991 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/30305
Imagem não selecionada

Imprime registro no formato completo
The 1996 One Percent Initiative in Idaho 31
Cooke, Stephen C..
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation Palavras-chave: Public Economics.
Ano: 1997 URL: http://purl.umn.edu/35783
Registros recuperados: 5
Primeira ... 1 ... Última
 

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa
Todos os direitos reservados, conforme Lei n° 9.610
Política de Privacidade
Área restrita

Embrapa
Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB s/n°
Brasília, DF - Brasil - CEP 70770-901
Fone: (61) 3448-4433 - Fax: (61) 3448-4890 / 3448-4891 SAC: https://www.embrapa.br/fale-conosco

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional