|
|
|
|
|
Le Floc'H, Pascal; Murillas, Arantza; Aranda, Martin; Daures, Fabienne; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Guyader, Olivier; Hatcher, Aaron; Macher, Claire; Marchal, Paul. |
A survey of past and existing management measures applied to different fisheries in European Western Waters is analyzed as a typology of co-management between governments and stakeholders. Faced with increasing constraints on accessing fish stocks, management measures have evolved toward fishing rights individualization, limited access and various other specific measures. Restrictions on access have changed fishermen’s behaviour in several significant ways. A comparative analysis, based on qualitative data collected through interviews and focus groups, is developed for fisheries from the following European countries: France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom. Past and existing individual harvesting rights in the four countries are reviewed and compared. |
Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Management; Fishery governance; Common Fishery Policy (CFP). |
Ano: 2015 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00248/35912/34455.pdf |
| |
|
|
Marchal, Paul; Andersen, Jesper Levring; Aranda, Martin; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Goti, Leyre; Guyader, Olivier; Haraldsson, Gunnar; Hatcher, Aaron; Hegland, Troels Jacob; Le Floc H, Pascal; Macher, Claire; Malvarosa, Loretta; Maravelias, Christos D.; Mardle, Simon; Murillas, Arantza; Nielsen, J. Rasmus; Sabatella, Rosaria; Smith, Anthony D. M.; Stokes, Kevin; Thoegersen, Thomas; Ulrich, Clara. |
This study compares the details and performance of fisheries management between the EU and a selection of other countries worldwide: Iceland, New Zealand, and Australia, which are considered in many respects to be among the most advanced in the world in fisheries management. Fisheries management in the EU, Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand has developed following different paths, despite being based on similar instruments and principles. Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand have been at the forefront of developing management practices such as stakeholder involvement, legally binding management targets (Australia, New Zealand), individual transferable quotas, and discard bans (Iceland, New Zealand). The EU has since the beginning of the 21st century taken... |
Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Australia; Comparative review; European Union; Fisheries management; Iceland; New Zealand. |
Ano: 2016 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00312/42305/41699.pdf |
| |
|
|
|