|
|
|
|
|
| Marchal, Paul; Andersen, Jesper Levring; Aranda, Martin; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Goti, Leyre; Guyader, Olivier; Haraldsson, Gunnar; Hatcher, Aaron; Hegland, Troels Jacob; Le Floc H, Pascal; Macher, Claire; Malvarosa, Loretta; Maravelias, Christos D.; Mardle, Simon; Murillas, Arantza; Nielsen, J. Rasmus; Sabatella, Rosaria; Smith, Anthony D. M.; Stokes, Kevin; Thoegersen, Thomas; Ulrich, Clara. |
| This study compares the details and performance of fisheries management between the EU and a selection of other countries worldwide: Iceland, New Zealand, and Australia, which are considered in many respects to be among the most advanced in the world in fisheries management. Fisheries management in the EU, Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand has developed following different paths, despite being based on similar instruments and principles. Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand have been at the forefront of developing management practices such as stakeholder involvement, legally binding management targets (Australia, New Zealand), individual transferable quotas, and discard bans (Iceland, New Zealand). The EU has since the beginning of the 21st century taken... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Australia; Comparative review; European Union; Fisheries management; Iceland; New Zealand. |
| Ano: 2016 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00312/42305/41699.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Daures, Fabienne; Girard, Sophie; Dieudonné, Eva; Mardle, Simon. |
| The D3.6 aims to assess the competiveness and sustainability of production systems (PS) for all case studies covered by SUCCESS (Whitefish, Flatfish, Coastal fish and shellfish, Mussels, Salmonids, Seabass & Seabream and Carp). This assessment relies on a number of selected indicators which include indicators of economic performance, economic dependency, social and environmental sustainability indicators. The seven case studies represent a significant part of the EU fisheries and aquaculture production (FAP) as they contributed to 55% of the total EU Seafood production in value (38% in volume) in 2014. Case studies include PS ranging from large production units and/or companies, strongly dependent on inputs availability and extra EU imports (whitefish... |
| Tipo: Text |
|
| Ano: 2018 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00486/59721/62819.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Malvarosa, Loretta; Murillas, Arantza; Lehuta, Sigrid; Nielsen, J. Rasmus; Macher, Claire; Goti, Leyre; Motova, Arina; Doering, Ralf; Haraldson, Gunnar; Accadia, Paolo; Hamon, Katell; Bastardie, Francois; Maravelias, Christos D.; Mardle, Simon; Thøgersen, Thomas. |
| An Impact Assessment (IA) is a process aimed at structuring and supporting the development of policies. Besides the fact that IA assumes different features when applied to different sectors, really it should help policy makers in evaluating the contribution to the fisheries sustainability of new regulations. The recent improvements and development around the IA methodologies go more and more toward the concept of a Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA). The evolution of IA in the fishery sector has followed the general and increasing need in having a more and more integrated type of analysis, focusing on the three dimensions of sustainability (environmental, economic and social). This paper synthesizes the methodology developed under the EU FP7 SOCIOEC... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Impact assessment; Fishery management; Effectiveness; Coherence; Acceptability; Sustainability. |
| Ano: 2019 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00474/58521/65966.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Le Gallic, Bertrand; Mardle, Simon; Metz, Sebastien. |
| The UK fishing sector has been under the spotlight since the beginning of the Brexit debate. Political commentators claimed that up to 90 per cent of British fishers supported Brexit as they considered the UK was disadvantaged compared to other EU Member States. Their main grudge is about the equal access that all Member States have had to all EU waters – with the exception of territorial waters, up to 12 nautical miles from the coast – since the formal inception of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) in 1983. Combined with what they perceive to be an unbalanced allocation of fishing quotas, this legal framework is thought by the UK fishing industry to be the main reason for the poor management of EU fisheries, which could be terminated following Brexit thus... |
| Tipo: Text |
|
| Ano: 2018 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00454/56612/60489.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Macher, Claire; Bailly, Denis; Ballesteros, Marta; Bertignac, Michel; Collocas, Francesco; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Frangoudes, Katia; Garcia, Dorleta; Kraan, Marloes; Little, Rich; Mardle, Simon; Murillas, Arantza; Pawlowski, Lionel; Philippe, Manuelle; Prellezo, Raul; Sabatella, Evelina; Steins, Nathalie; Thebaud, Olivier; Ulrich, Clara. |
| Implementation of Ecosystem Based Management in fisheries has led to higher integration of knowledge in advices and higher engagement of stakeholders in the decision support Process. As part of the process, fisheries scientists contribute in different ways and at different levels to decision support and experienced partnership approaches in the context of research projects or institutional decision support. Role of scientists in the process is however not trivial to define and operationalize. Several pitfalls can occur that scientists may have experienced through partnership projects or in the expert assessments done for authorities. A workshop was organized from 15 to 17 January 2018 as part of the ScipaDe ... |
| Tipo: Text |
|
| Ano: 2018 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00463/57452/59561.pdf |
| |
|
|
|
