|
|
|
|
|
Le Floc'H, Pascal; Murillas, Arantza; Aranda, Martin; Daures, Fabienne; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Guyader, Olivier; Hatcher, Aaron; Macher, Claire; Marchal, Paul. |
A survey of past and existing management measures applied to different fisheries in European Western Waters is analyzed as a typology of co-management between governments and stakeholders. Faced with increasing constraints on accessing fish stocks, management measures have evolved toward fishing rights individualization, limited access and various other specific measures. Restrictions on access have changed fishermen’s behaviour in several significant ways. A comparative analysis, based on qualitative data collected through interviews and focus groups, is developed for fisheries from the following European countries: France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom. Past and existing individual harvesting rights in the four countries are reviewed and compared. |
Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Management; Fishery governance; Common Fishery Policy (CFP). |
Ano: 2015 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00248/35912/34455.pdf |
| |
|
|
Macher, Claire; Bailly, Denis; Ballesteros, Marta; Bertignac, Michel; Collocas, Francesco; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Frangoudes, Katia; Garcia, Dorleta; Kraan, Marloes; Little, Rich; Mardle, Simon; Murillas, Arantza; Pawlowski, Lionel; Philippe, Manuelle; Prellezo, Raul; Sabatella, Evelina; Steins, Nathalie; Thebaud, Olivier; Ulrich, Clara. |
Implementation of Ecosystem Based Management in fisheries has led to higher integration of knowledge in advices and higher engagement of stakeholders in the decision support Process. As part of the process, fisheries scientists contribute in different ways and at different levels to decision support and experienced partnership approaches in the context of research projects or institutional decision support. Role of scientists in the process is however not trivial to define and operationalize. Several pitfalls can occur that scientists may have experienced through partnership projects or in the expert assessments done for authorities. A workshop was organized from 15 to 17 January 2018 as part of the ScipaDe ... |
Tipo: Text |
|
Ano: 2018 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00463/57452/59561.pdf |
| |
|
|
Malvarosa, Loretta; Murillas, Arantza; Lehuta, Sigrid; Nielsen, J. Rasmus; Macher, Claire; Goti, Leyre; Motova, Arina; Doering, Ralf; Haraldson, Gunnar; Accadia, Paolo; Hamon, Katell; Bastardie, Francois; Maravelias, Christos D.; Mardle, Simon; Thøgersen, Thomas. |
An Impact Assessment (IA) is a process aimed at structuring and supporting the development of policies. Besides the fact that IA assumes different features when applied to different sectors, really it should help policy makers in evaluating the contribution to the fisheries sustainability of new regulations. The recent improvements and development around the IA methodologies go more and more toward the concept of a Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA). The evolution of IA in the fishery sector has followed the general and increasing need in having a more and more integrated type of analysis, focusing on the three dimensions of sustainability (environmental, economic and social). This paper synthesizes the methodology developed under the EU FP7 SOCIOEC... |
Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Impact assessment; Fishery management; Effectiveness; Coherence; Acceptability; Sustainability. |
Ano: 2019 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00474/58521/65966.pdf |
| |
|
|
Marchal, Paul; Andersen, Jesper Levring; Aranda, Martin; Fitzpatrick, Mike; Goti, Leyre; Guyader, Olivier; Haraldsson, Gunnar; Hatcher, Aaron; Hegland, Troels Jacob; Le Floc H, Pascal; Macher, Claire; Malvarosa, Loretta; Maravelias, Christos D.; Mardle, Simon; Murillas, Arantza; Nielsen, J. Rasmus; Sabatella, Rosaria; Smith, Anthony D. M.; Stokes, Kevin; Thoegersen, Thomas; Ulrich, Clara. |
This study compares the details and performance of fisheries management between the EU and a selection of other countries worldwide: Iceland, New Zealand, and Australia, which are considered in many respects to be among the most advanced in the world in fisheries management. Fisheries management in the EU, Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand has developed following different paths, despite being based on similar instruments and principles. Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand have been at the forefront of developing management practices such as stakeholder involvement, legally binding management targets (Australia, New Zealand), individual transferable quotas, and discard bans (Iceland, New Zealand). The EU has since the beginning of the 21st century taken... |
Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Australia; Comparative review; European Union; Fisheries management; Iceland; New Zealand. |
Ano: 2016 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00312/42305/41699.pdf |
| |
|
|
|