|
|
|
|
|
Virtanen, Elina; Niemelä, Waltteri; Bekkby, Trine; Gonçalves, Jorge; Laamanen, Leena; Lillis, Helen; Manca, Eleonora; Pesch, Roland; Tempera, Fernando; Vasquez, Mickael; Viitasalo, Markku; Castle, Lewis; O’keefe, Eimear. |
A summary of European studies to date that have aimed to model the potential distribution of seabed habitats or habitat-forming species. This report is the result of a literature review covering the period 2007-2017. |
Tipo: Text |
|
Ano: 2019 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00636/74783/75027.pdf |
| |
|
|
Vasquez, Mickael; Manca, Eleonora; Inghilesi, Roberto; Martin, Simon; Agnesi, Sabrina; Al Hamdani, Zyad; Annunziatellis, Aldo; Bekkby, Trine; Pesch, Roland; Askew, Natalie; Bentes, Luis; Castle, Lewis; Doncheva, Valentina; Drakopoulou, Vivi; Gonçalves, Jorge; Laamanen, Leena; Lillis, Helen; Loukaidi, Valia; Mcgrath, Fergal; Mo, Giulia; Monteiro, Pedro; Muresan, Mihaela; O'Keeffe, Eimear; Populus, Jacques; Pinder, Jordan; Ridgeway, Amy; Sakellariou, Dimitris; Simboura, Mika; Teaca, Adrian; Tempera, Fernando; Todorova, Valentina; Tunesi, Leonardo; Virtanen, Elina. |
EUSeaMap 2019 is the third iteration of EUSeaMap. All versions have been produced as part of the EMODnet Seabed Habitats project, which is one of several thematic lots in EMODnet. The project has brought together a European consortium of specialists in benthic ecology and seabed habitat mapping. The partners first collaborated in EMODnet phase 1 (2009-2012) to deliver a prototype predictive seabed habitat map in four trial basins (Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, Baltic, Western Mediterranean). This predictive model was named EUSeaMap (Cameron and Askew, 2011). In EMODnet Phase 2 (2012-2016), the consortium extended EUSeaMap coverage to all European regions (Populus et al, 2017). In the new version, the spatial coverage was extended further North in order... |
Tipo: Text |
|
Ano: 2020 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00636/74782/75026.pdf |
| |
|
|
Vasquez, Mickael; Agnesi, Sabrina; Al Hamdani, Zyad; Annunziatellis, Aldo; Askew, Natalie; Bekkby, Trine; Bentes, Luis; Castle, Lewis; Doncheva, Valentina; Duncan, Graeme; Gonçalves, Jorge; Inghilesi, Roberto; Laamanen, Leena; Lillis, Helen; Manca, Eleonora; Mcgrath, Fergal; Mo, Giulia; Monteiro, Pedro; Muresan, Mihaela; O'Keeffe, Eimear; Pesch, Roland; Pinder, Jordan; Teaca, Adrian; Todorova, Valentina; Tunesi, Leonardo; Virtanen, Elina. |
Since its inception, in 2009, EMODnet Seabed Habitats has brought together a European consortium of specialists in benthic ecology and seabed habitat mapping to develop a transnational broad-scale seabed habitat map, named EUSeaMap. EUSeaMap is the only pan-European cartographic product that provides a standardised trans-boundary overview of the spatial distribution of seabed habitats across Europe. As such, it has been extensively used in various applications such as Marine Protected Area evaluation or cumulative impact of stressors on habitats, and it is likely to be used again in the future in various marine ecosystem assessments. It is therefore important to continue to update it regularly when significant improvements to the data products that... |
Tipo: Text |
|
Ano: 2021 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00668/78021/80272.pdf |
| |
|
|
Graef, Frieder; Römbke, Jörg; Binimelis, Rosa; Myhr, Anne Ingeborg; Hilbeck, Angelika; Breckling, Boder; Dalgaard, Tommy; Stachow, Ulrich; Catacora-Vargas, Georgina; Bohn, Thomas; Quist, David; Darvas, Béla; Dudel, Gert; Oehen, Bernadette; Meyer, Hartmut; Henle, Klaus; Wynne, Brian; Metzger, Marc J.; Knäbe, Silvio; Settele, Josef; Székács, András; Wurbs, Angelika; Bernard, Jeannette; Murphy-Bokern, Donal; Buiatti, Marcello; Giovannetti, Manuela; Debeljak, Marko; Andersen, Erling; Paetz, Andreas; Dzeroski, Saso; Tappeser, Beatrix; van Gestel, Cornelis A.M.; Wosniok, Werner; Séralini, Gilles-Eric; Aslaksen, Iulie; Pesch, Roland; Maly, Stanislav; Werner, Armin. |
The assessment of the impacts of growing genetically modified (GM) crops remains a major political and scientific challenge in Europe. Concerns have been raised by the evidence of adverse and unexpected environmental effects and differing opinions on the outcomes of environmental risk assessments (ERA). The current regulatory system is hampered by insufficiently developed methods for GM crop safety testing and introduction studies. Improvement to the regulatory system needs to address the lack of well designed GM crop monitoring frameworks, professional and financial conflicts of interest within the ERA research and testing community, weaknesses in consideration of stakeholder interests and specific regional conditions, and the lack of comprehensive... |
Tipo: Journal paper |
Palavras-chave: Biodiversity and ecosystem services. |
Ano: 2012 |
URL: http://orgprints.org/23020/1/Graef-etal-2012-BioRisk-Vol7-p73-97.pdf |
| |
|
|
|